Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The quality of social support: Measures of family and work relationships

Holahan, Charles J., Moos, Rudolf H.·1983·British Journal of Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00596.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper describes the development of indices of the quality of social support in the family (FRI) and work (WRI) environments. Respondents were a randomly selected community sample of 267 men and 267 women adult family members. The FRI and WRI were found to have high reliability and good concurrent and construct validity. The FRI and WRI (for male respondents) were negatively related to physical and psychological symptoms, and both indices showed moderate positive relationships to a traditional measure of social support.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00596.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
157-162
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
DOI
10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00596.x
OpenAlex
W2077751708
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The quality of social support: Measures of family and work relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00596.x
The paper
Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1983). The quality of social support: Measures of family and work relationships. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00596.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.