Cited by 73Schizophrenia research and treatmentMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The habitual use of emotion regulation strategies in schizophrenia

Perry, Yael, Henry, Julie D., Grisham, Jessica R.·2011·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. Although emotion dysregulation is regarded as a core feature of schizophrenia, the use of specific regulatory strategies remains poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the habitual use of suppression, reappraisal, and acceptance in this population. METHODS. Thirty-three individuals with schizophrenia and 36 matched controls completed self-report measures examining emotion regulation and psychosocial functioning. RESULTS. No group differences were found in terms of use of suppression or reappraisal, but clinical participants reported using less acceptance. Further, greater use of acceptance was associated with better psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSIONS. Results highlight the potential utility of acceptance-based interventions for comorbid psychopathology in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2010.02001.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotion-related factors such as reduced emotional awareness, emotional regulation, negative affect and emotional suppression are associated with poor social functioning in psychosis.

    “Furthermore, emotion‐related factors included reduced emotional awareness (Kimhy et al. 2012; Kimhy et al. 2016), and emotional regulation (Vines et al. 2022), negative affect (Grove et al. 2016) and emotional suppression (Perry et al. 2011).”

    From Social Functioning Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review. (2025) · cites this paper as Perry et al. 2011

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 18 · Cited by 73

Authors
Perry, Y., Henry, J. D., & Grisham, J. R.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Perry, Yael
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-24
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
217-222
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W1941361616
Cited by
73
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
schizophrenia, emotion regulation, emotion regulation strategies, emotional suppression, cognitive reappraisal, acceptance, emotional dysregulation, psychosocial functioning, acceptance-based interventions, comorbid psychopathology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Problem Solving, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Repression, Psychology, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review