The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome: Do illness perceptions play a regulatory role?
Abstract
The relationships between illness perceptions, coping and adjustment were investigated in the context of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Self‐reported illness perceptions, coping, disability levels and psychological well‐being were assessed in a national sample of 233 CFS sufferers. A series of regression analyses indicated that illness perceptions explained a greater percentage of the variance in levels of disability and psychological well‐being than did the coping strategies used by the participants to manage their illness. The illness perception components of illness identity, emotional causes, controllability and consequences had the strongest overall association with adjustment such that participants with a strong illness identity, who believed their illness was out of their control, caused by stress and had very serious consequences were most disabled and psychologically impaired. Disengagement coping strategies and venting emotions were also associated with greater disability and poorer psychological well‐being, while positive reinterpretation and seeking social support were positively related to psychological well‐being. The potential role of illness perceptions in the maintenance of CFS is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 · Cited by 4,845
Coping theory and research: past, present, and future
Lazarus, R. S. (1993) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199305000-00002 · Cited by 3,253
Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M., & Leventhal, E. A. (1992) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173486 · Cited by 1,573
Carver, C. S., Pozo, C., Harris, S. D., Noriega, V., Scheier, M. F., Robinson, D. S., Ketcham, A. S., Moffat, F. L., & Clark, K. C. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.375 · Cited by 1,228
Cameron, L., Leventhal, E. A., & Leventhal, H. (1993) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.3.171 · Cited by 315
Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic.
Sharpe, M., Hawton, K., Seagroatt, V., & Pasvol, G. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6846.147 · Cited by 198
Cited by
The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R)
Moss-Morris, R., Weinman, J., Petrie, K., Horne, R., Cameron, L., & Buick, D. (2002) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440290001494 · Cited by 2,949
Self-citationA Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations
Hagger, M. S., & Orbell, S. (2003) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/088704403100081321 · Cited by 1,607
Prins, J. B., van der Meer, J. W., & Bleijenberg, G. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68073-2 · Cited by 974
The role of illness severity and illness representations in adjusting to multiple sclerosis
Jopson, N. M., & Moss-Morris, R. (2003) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00455-5 · Cited by 235
Self-citationIllness beliefs and treatment outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome
Deale, A., Chalder, T., & Wessely, S. (1998) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(98)00021-x · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Moss‐Morris, R., Petrie, K. J., & Weinman, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-25
- ISSN
- 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8287
- OpenAlex
- W2138621046
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
