Cited by 46Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Children's physical health complaints after exposure to intimate partner violence

Lamers‐Winkelman, Francien, Schipper, J. Clasien De, Oosterman, Mirjam·2012·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Objectives A clear association between exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and children's physical health is still not well determined, because adverse effects might be explained by the confounding detrimental effects of other traumatic experiences. This study investigated whether children exposed to IPV have higher risks for physical health complaints compared to children in a general population sample. Second, health complaint differences were explored between IPV witnesses and those who in addition experienced other forms of abuse or neglect. Design Risk estimates for 21 everyday physical health complaints were made for children exposed to IPV compared to a general population sample using odds ratios. Methods Primary caregivers of 275 child witnesses of IPV (6-12 years of age) referred to several specialized mental health or child welfare institutes throughout the Netherlands (2004-2009) reported on children's somatic complaints using 21 items of the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) reflecting sleeping, eating, pain complaints, and self-harm. Results Compared to a population sample (n= 903), child witnesses more often experienced health complaints, in particular, more eating, sleeping, and pain problems and more self-harm. Few differences in health complaints were found between child witnesses with and without additional adverse experiences of maltreatment. Conclusions The degree of physical health complaints in children exposed to IPV i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02072.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children who are exposed to IPV have significantly more eating, sleeping, and pain complaints than children who have not been exposed to domestic violence.

    “Children who are exposed to IPV also have significantly more eating, sleeping, and pain complaints than children who have not been exposed to domestic violence (Lamers-Winkelman, Schipper, & Oosterman, 2012).”

    From A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE IMPACT OF EXPOSURE TO INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (2014) · cites this paper as Lamers-Winkelman, Schipper, & Oosterman, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lamers‐Winkelman, F., Schipper, J. C. D., & Oosterman, M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
771-784
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W2149152167
Cited by
46
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
intimate partner violence, physical health complaints, somatic symptoms, feeding difficulties, sleep disorders, pain complaints, self-harm, child abuse, childhood adversity, primary caregivers, Child Behavior Checklist, child mental health services, child welfare services
MeSH terms
Child, Child Welfare, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Pain, Parent-Child Relations, Risk, Sleep Wake Disorders, Odds Ratio, Self-Injurious Behavior, Domestic Violence, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review