The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RESPONSE TO AFFIRMATIVE AND NEGATIVE BINARY STATEMENTS
Abstract
A previous experiment showed consistent and significant differences in the times taken to complete true affirmative, false affirmative, true negative and false negative statements in relation to given situations. In that task only one pattern of stimuli could have made an affirmative true and a negative false, but more than one could have made an affirmative false and a negative true. The present investigation equates the specificity of all statements, and hence eliminates the disjunctive implication of false affirmatives and true negatives by utilizing the mutually exclusive classes of odd and even numbers as material. Two tasks were used, ( a ) ‘verification’, i.e. determining whether a statement about a number is true or false, and ( b ) ‘construction’, i.e. stating a number to make a statement either true or false. In both tasks the form of a statement (affirmative or negative) was significant at the 0·001 level at the end of practice. In the construction task the truth value of a statement (true or false) was also significant at the 0·001 level, but in the verification task it was not significant. These results were obtained from two groups who performed the tasks in a different order. The cognitive processes involved in the tasks are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Wason, P. C. (1968) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/14640746808400161 · Cited by 1,476
Self-citation(1963) · Cited by 855
A 3 min reasoning test based on grammatical transformation
Baddeley, A. D. (1968) · Psychonomic Science · doi:10.3758/bf03331551 · Cited by 649
Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood
Slobin, D. I. (1966) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80023-3 · Cited by 472
Metadata
- Authors
- WASON, P. C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1961-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-142
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W1985431742
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RESPONSE TO AFFIRMATIVE AND NEGATIVE BINARY STATEMENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1961.tb00775.x
- The paper
- WASON, P. C. (1961). RESPONSE TO AFFIRMATIVE AND NEGATIVE BINARY STATEMENTS. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1961.tb00775.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.