The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HANDEDNESS AND CONTROLLED MOVEMENT
Abstract
Subjects classified according to degree of hand preference were tested with both hands on two tasks of controlled movement. Strongly lateralized subjects (both left‐ and right‐handers) showed greater skill with their better hand than ambilaterals on a visually controlled aiming test (faster speed and equal errors), but there were no marked differences between groups with the other hand. Between‐hand differences were also greater in lateralized subjects. On a ballistic rhythmical tapping test, no marked differences in speed were found, but ambilaterals made slightly fewer errors with the better hand. It is argued (i) that for ballistic movements the hands are equipotential, and skill is a direct function of practice, (ii) that the essential dexterity difference between the preferred and non‐preferred hands is in the sensory or feedback control of movements rather than in motor function per se , and (iii) ambilaterals, especially those with very mixed preferences, have virtually two non‐preferred hands in continuously controlled movement tasks, and may therefore rely on ballistic movements more than do pronounced sinistrals and dextrals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Asymmetric Division of Labor in Human Skilled Bimanual Action: The Kinematic Chain as a Model
Guiard, Y. (1987) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1987.10735426 · Cited by 1,134
Metadata
- Authors
- FLOWERS, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-52
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2005640781
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HANDEDNESS AND CONTROLLED MOVEMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01438.x
- The paper
- FLOWERS, K. (1975). HANDEDNESS AND CONTROLLED MOVEMENT. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01438.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.