The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individual differences in right and left reaction time.
Abstract
Experiments designed to check the absence of effects for hands and handedness in simple and two-choice reaction time found unexpected individual differences related to stimulus laterality. The majority of subjects responded faster to the stimulus on the left and a substantial minority responded faster to the stimulus on the right in any choice pair. The right index finger was slower than the left index or the middle fingers. Choices tended to be faster between fingers on different hands than on the same hand and same-hand choices were faster with the left hand than the right hand. There were no effects attributable to hand preference or sex.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, other studies have failed to find significant sex differences (Annett and Annett, 1979; Gottsdanker, 1982; Der and Deary, 2006).”
From Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (2015) · cites this paper as Annett and Annett, 1979
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leocani, L., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Ikoma, K., & Hallett, M. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.6.1161 · Cited by 402
Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Reed, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131 · Cited by 336
“However, other studies have failed to find significant sex differences (Annett and Annett, 1979; Gottsdanker, 1982; Der and Deary, 2006).”
BackgroundThe Control of Movement in the Preferred and Non-Preferred Hands
Annett, J., Annett, M., Hudson, P. T. W., & Turner, A. (1979) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/14640747908400755 · Cited by 228
Self-citationAging and Rapid Aiming Arm Movement Control
Yan, J. H. (1998) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/036107398244292 · Cited by 117
Intersensory facilitation in the motor component?
Diederich, A., & Colonius, H. (1987) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/bf00309199 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Annett, M., & Annett, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-404
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2110838266
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Warwick
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Keywords
- individual differences, reaction time, handedness, hemispheric lateralization, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Female, Fingers, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Reaction Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
