The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accurate non‐word spelling despite congenital inability to speak: Phoneme—grapheme conversion does not require subvocal articulation
Abstract
Previous work has shown that children with motor speech disorders (dysarthria) have no particular difficulty in spelling non‐words containing sounds that they cannot produce accurately in their own speech. This suggests that subvocal articulation is not implicated in generating a graphemic representation from a phonological string. However, it could be argued that, although severely unintelligible, dysarthric individuals may be able to use their own articulation as a basis for translating between phonemes and graphemes. In this study we investigated spelling of words and non‐words in cerebral palsied individuals, including speechless (anarthric) as well as dysarthric subjects. Although spelling abilities of these individuals were below control levels, there was no evidence that different processes were used, and one anarthric individual achieved perfect performance in spelling a list of non‐words which included consonant clusters. It is concluded that spelling by the ‘indirect’ route can be achieved in the absence of any articulation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Third, disruption of the articulatory system does not always lead to disrupted inner speech.”
From Bridging phenomenology and neural mechanisms of inner speech: ALE meta-analysis on egocentricity and spontaneity in a dual-mechanistic framework (2023) · cites this paper as Bishop & Robson, 1989
In the citing paper
“Individuals unable to articulate due to congenital disorders can accurately perform tasks reliant on inner speech, such as rhyme judgements (Baddeley & Wilson, 1985; Bishop & Robson, 1989; Smith et al., 2009; Vallar & Cappa, 1987).”
From Bridging phenomenology and neural mechanisms of inner speech: ALE meta-analysis on egocentricity and spontaneity in a dual-mechanistic framework (2023) · cites this paper as Bishop & Robson, 1989
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pratts, J., Pobric, G., & Yao, B. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120399 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bishop, D. V. M., & Robson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bishop, D. V. M.
- ORCID
- Bishop, D. V. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W1992447072
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- cerebral palsy, anarthria, dysarthria, motor speech disorders, graphemic representation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Articulation Disorders, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Dysarthria, Female, Humans, Male, Phonetics, Semantics, Speech Disorders, Verbal Learning, Vocabulary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review