Mother tongue, language of schooling and bilingual digit span
Abstract
The present study investigated whether language differences in digit span are due to differential levels of familiarity and practice arising from experiences associated with the mother tongue (language of the home), language of the school or to cross‐linguistic differences in word length. Mother tongue and language of schooling were varied orthogonally to create four bilingual types: Finnish or Swedish mother tongue and language of schooling (FF and SS), Finnish mother tongue and Swedish language of schooling (FS) and vice versa (SF). Subjects were tested for digit reading rate and digit span with and without articulatory suppression. The results showed that constant bilinguals (FF and SS) obtained faster reading rates and larger digit spans in their dominant language, whereas compound bilinguals (FS and SF) showed no difference between the languages on either measure. Language of schooling was identified as a powerful determinant of bilingual digit span differences, but did not account for the full range of findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research found no difference in digit span performance assessed in L1 and L2 in children whose L2 was also their language of schooling.
“However, previous research found no difference in digit span performance assessed in L1 and L2 in children whose L2 was also their language of schooling (Chincotta & Underwood, 1996).”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Chincotta & Underwood, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10122-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chincotta, D., & Underwood, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Chincotta, Dino
- ORCID
- Underwood, Geoffrey
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-208
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2151563748
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Erasmus+
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- bilingualism, digit span, language of instruction, mother tongue, language familiarity, word length, articulatory suppression, cross-linguistic differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review