Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CONDITIONAL INFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE‐CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRES

Andersen, Erling B.·1973·British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Abstract

Since most of the literature on the extension of Rasch's (1961) model to multiple‐ choice questionnaires is only available in Danish, this paper gives a short introduction to the model. The main body of the paper, however, is concerned with the conditional maximum‐likelihood estimation of the item parameters. The theory is applied to data from a questionnaire used to measure job satisfaction in Danish factories. Finally, the problem of reducing the dimensionality of the parameters is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1973.tb00504.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, E. B.
Venue
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1973-05
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
31-44
ISSN
  • 0007-1102 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8317
OpenAlex
W1982564453
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONDITIONAL INFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE‐CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1973.tb00504.x
The paper
Andersen, E. B. (1973). CONDITIONAL INFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE‐CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRES. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1973.tb00504.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.