The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The concentration of offending in families
Abstract
In the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, 411 London males from 397 families of origin have been followed up from age eight to age 32 by interviews, and from age 10 to age 40 in records. This paper relates convictions of these males to convictions of their biological fathers and mothers, full brothers and sisters, and wives. Overall, 601 out of 2203 birth family members were convicted (1.5 convicted persons on average out of 5.5 persons per family). While 64 per cent of the families contained at least one convicted person, only 6 per cent of the families accounted for half of all the convictions. Convictions of one family member were strongly related to convictions of every other family member. In both generations, the majority of convicted mothers mated with convicted fathers. About three‐quarters of convicted fathers and convicted mothers had a convicted child, and about three‐quarters of families containing convicted daughters also contained convicted sons. Same‐sex relationships within generations and between generations were stronger than opposite‐sex relationships. Convictions of older siblings were more strongly related to convictions of the Study male than were convictions of younger siblings. Convictions of each family member were independendy related to convictions of the Study male. Very little of the association between convictions of family members was attributable to co‐offending. It is concluded that offending is strongly concentrated in families and tends to be transmitted from one generation to the next; however, this research does not establish the precise mechanism of transmission (genetic or environmental).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moffitt, T. E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.533 · Cited by 787
Risk factors for conduct disorder and delinquency: key findings from longitudinal studies
Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2010) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371005501003 · Cited by 529
Self-citationTesting hypotheses on specific environmental causal effects on behavior.
Rutter, M., Pickles, A., Murray, R., & Eaves, L. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.3.291 · Cited by 518
FARRINGTON, D. P., JOLLIFFE, D., LOEBER, R., STOUTHAMER-LOEBER, M., & KALB, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2001.0424 · Cited by 476
Self-citationChildhood origins of antisocial behavior
Farrington, D. P. (2005) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.448 · Cited by 443
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrington, D. P., Barnes, G. C., & Lambert, S.
- Venue
- Legal and Criminological Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-63
- ISSN
- 1355-3259 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8333
- OpenAlex
- W2137334027
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The concentration of offending in families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00306.x
- The paper
- Farrington, D. P., Barnes, G. C., & Lambert, S. (1996). The concentration of offending in families. Legal and Criminological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00306.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.