The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychopathy and recidivism: A review
Abstract
Psychopathy is defined by a constellation of interpersonal, affective and behavioural characteristics that should, in principle, be strongly related to risk for recidivism and violence. We reviewed the literature on The Hare Psychopathy Checklist‐Revised scales (PCL‐R; Hare, 1980, 1991) and recidivism. We found that the PCL‐R consistently was an important predictor across inmate samples and was consistently among the best predictors of recidivism. Average correlations between the PCL‐R and recidivism, weighted by their degrees of freedom, were .27 for general recidivism, .27 for violent recidivism, and .23 for sexual recidivism. Relative risk statistics at one year indicated that psychopaths were approximately three times more likely to recidivate—or four times more likely to violently recidivate—than were non‐psychopaths. The correlation between general recidivism and PCL‐R Factor 2 (a measure of the social deviance facet of psychopathy) was stronger than the correlation between general recidivism and PCL‐R Factor 1 (a measure of the interpersonal/affective facet of psychopathy). Both PCL‐R factors contributed equally to the prediction of violent recidivism. The PCL‐R routinely made a significant contribution towards predicting recidivism beyond that made by key demographic variables, criminal history, and personality disorder diagnoses. Across studies, PCL‐R scores were as strongly associated with general recidivism, and were more strongly associated with violent recidivism, than were actuarial risk scales designed specifically to predict reoffending. Taken together, these findings indicate that the PCL‐R should be considered a primary instrument for guiding clinical assessments of risk for criminal recidivism and dangerousness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model.
Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171 · Cited by 1,535
Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales.
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1005482921333 · Cited by 1,051
Callous-unemotional traits in a community sample of adolescents
Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191106287354 · Cited by 875
Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., & Neumann, C. S. (2003) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191103010002005 · Cited by 513
Psychopathy as a Risk Factor for Violence
Hare, R. D. (1999) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1023/a:1022094925150 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S.
- Venue
- Legal and Criminological Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-170
- ISSN
- 1355-3259 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8333
- OpenAlex
- W2138511794
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00355.x
- The paper
- Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00355.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.