The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STANDARDIZATION OF PROGRESSIVE MATRICES, 1938
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“IQ scores increased, even-indeed, especially-on “culture-fair” tests such as the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1941).”
From Human Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Raven, 1941
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure.
Flynn, J. R. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171 · Cited by 1,918
Evidence for a Frontoparietal Control System Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity
Vincent, J. L., Kahn, I., Snyder, A. Z., Raichle, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.90355.2008 · Cited by 1,869
The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time
Raven, J. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735 · Cited by 1,560
Self-citationDarwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08003543 · Cited by 1,174
Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging
Ramnani, N., & Owen, A. M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1343 · Cited by 1,170
Metadata
- Authors
- RAVEN, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Royal Institution of Great Britain (GB)
- Corresponding author
- RAVEN, JOHN C.
- ORCID
- RAVEN, JOHN C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Medical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1941-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-150
- ISSN
- 0007-1129 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011532375
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Medical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Raven's Progressive Matrices, standardization, intelligence testing, nonverbal intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
