The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour
Abstract
Many behaviour, psychotherapy and healthy life‐style programmes require subjects to take responsibility for the control of the old unwanted behaviours or to be responsible for maintaining new desired behaviours after therapy has ended. A scale to measure the locus of control of behaviour would be valuable if it could predict persons likely to relapse following apparently successful therapy. A 17‐item Likert‐type scale to measure this construct was developed and shown to have satisfactory internal reliability, to be test‐retest reliable in the absence of treatment, to be independent of age, sex and social desirability, and to distinguish clinical disorder from normal non‐clinical subjects. Furthermore, change towards internality (a reduced LCB score) during therapy was shown to predict maintenance or, alternatively, change towards externality (an increase or no change in the LCB score) was shown to predict relapse 10 months later in treated stutterers. The scale was shown to be related to the personal control factor of the Rotter I–E scale but to be more powerful a predictor of relapse than this personal control subscale or the full Rotter scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Cited by
Driver fatigue: Electroencephalography and psychological assessment
Lal, S. K. L., & Craig, A. (2002) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201393095 · Cited by 533
Self-citationPsychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in depressed clinical samples
Page, A. C., Hooke, G. R., & Morrison, D. L. (2007) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466506x158996 · Cited by 301
A Phenomenological Understanding of Successful Stuttering Management
Plexico, L., Manning, W. H., & DiLollo, A. (2005) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.12.001 · Cited by 175
Boyce, P. M., Talley, N. J., Balaam, B., Koloski, N. A., & Truman, G. (2003) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07716.x · Cited by 167
The Relationship between Mental Health Disorders and Treatment Outcomes among Adults Who Stutter
Iverach, L., Jones, M., O’Brian, S., Block, S., Lincoln, M., Harrison, E., Hewat, S., Cream, A., Menzies, R. G., Packman, A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.02.002 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, A. R., Franklin, J. A., & Andrews, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Medical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-180
- ISSN
- 0007-1129 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030936754
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb01597.x
- The paper
- Craig, A. R., Franklin, J. A., & Andrews, G. (1984). A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour. British Journal of Medical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb01597.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.