The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Test of Homogeneity of Means Under Restricted Alternatives
Abstract
SUMMARY: Suppose that observations x1, x2, …, xk have been obtained from normal populations with unknown means μ1, μ2, …, μk and known standard deviations σ1, σ2, …, σk. The paper discusses tests of the hypothesis μ 1, μ 2, … = μk when prior information is available about the μ‘s under the alternative hypothesis. A generalized form of the χ 2-test, denoted by x2¯, has been developed for use when this information takes the form of order restrictions between some or all of the μ‘s. The distribution is shown to depend on that of χ 2 and certain probabilities which have been determined for many sets of order restrictions. The power function has been obtained in certain cases and used to compare the x2¯-test with χ 2, which assumes no prior information. This shows that the utilization of order information often leads to a considerable gain in power. Power comparisons with other versions of x2¯ and with tests based on scores suggest that no worthwhile improvement over x2¯ is possible. The paper is an extension and generalization of work contained in two earlier papers (Bartholomew, 1959a, b).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718
Cited by
Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method
Kruskal, J. B. (1964) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289694 · Cited by 4,846
A multivariate analogue of the one-sided test
KUDO, A. (1963) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/50.3-4.403 · Cited by 368
Patton, A. J., & Timmermann, A. (2010) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.06.006 · Cited by 280
Cox, G., & Shi, X. (2023) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdac015 · Cited by 48
Constrained statistical inference: sample-size tables for ANOVA and regression
Vanbrabant, L., Van De Schoot, R., & Rosseel, Y. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01565 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartholomew, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1961-07-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-272
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2905192147
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Test of Homogeneity of Means Under Restricted Alternatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1961.tb00410.x
- The paper
- Bartholomew, D. J. (1961). A Test of Homogeneity of Means Under Restricted Alternatives. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1961.tb00410.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.