The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data
Abstract
SUMMARY: It is common to observe a vector of discrete and/or continuous responses in scientific problems where the objective is to characterize the dependence of each response on explanatory variables and to account for the association between the outcomes. The response vector can comprise repeated observations on one variable, as in longitudinal studies or genetic studies of families, or can include observations for different variables. This paper discusses a class of models for the marginal expectations of each response and for pairwise associations. The marginal models are contrasted with log-linear models. Two generalized estimating equation approaches are compared for parameter estimation. The first focuses on the regression parameters; the second simultaneously estimates the regression and association parameters. The robustness and efficiency of each is discussed. The methods are illustrated with analyses of two data sets from public health research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
Cited by
The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices
Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001 · Cited by 1,585
Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies
Little, R. J. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476615 · Cited by 1,522
An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data
Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K. (1992) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780111406 · Cited by 678
Self-citationThe validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments
Buyse, M., Molenberghs, G., Burzykowski, T., Renard, D., & Geys, H. (2000) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.49 · Cited by 624
A Note on the Efficiency of Sandwich Covariance Matrix Estimation
Kauermann, G., & Carroll, R. J. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382309 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, K.-Y., Zeger, S. L., & Qaqish, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-09-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-24
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2513881572
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01862.x
- The paper
- Liang, K.-Y., Zeger, S. L., & Qaqish, B. (1992). Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01862.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.