Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Image Deblurring to Optimal Investments: Maximum Likelihood Solutions for Positive Linear Inverse Problems

Vardi, Y., Lee, D.·1993·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

SUMMARY: The problem of recovering an input signal from a blurred output, in an input-output system with linear distortion, is ubiquitous in science and technology. When the blurred output is not degraded by statistical noise the problem is entirely deterministic and amounts to a mathematical inversion of a linear system with positive parameters, subject to positivity constraints on the solution. We show that all such linear inverse problems with positivity restrictions (LININPOS problems for short) can be interpreted as statistical estimation problems from incomplete data based on infinitely large ‘samples’, and that maximum likelihood (ML) estimation and the EM algorithm provide a straightforward method of solution for such problems. This applies to such classical problems as algebraic systems of linear equations, Fredholm's integral equations of the first kind, mixture models, deconvolutions, etc., all with positivity restrictions but with no stochastic components. In connecting the class of LININPOS problems with the corresponding class of ML estimation problems from incomplete data, we unify numerous examples from diverse areas of applications where the EM algorithm has been independently derived over the years, and we present some new opportunities for problems that have previously been unattempted. Examples include signal recovery problems, tomographic reconstructions and optimal investment portfolios, as well as more traditional statistical problems like ML estimation from censored and grouped data, and from incomplete contingency tables. The problem of restoring a ‘true’ image from its linearly distorted version is important in image analysis. Such problems can occur, for example, as a result of lens distortion (e.g. the Hubble space telescope), out-of-focus blur and blur due to relative motion between the subject and the camera during the photographic exposure. These problems often fall in the category of LININPOS problems, in which case the methodology is applicable. We demonstrate it on the problem of deblurring motion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01925.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Vardi, Y., & Lee, D.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
1993-07-01
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
569-598
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W2482485328
Cited by
248
References
3
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Image Deblurring to Optimal Investments: Maximum Likelihood Solutions for Positive Linear Inverse Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01925.x
The paper
Vardi, Y., & Lee, D. (1993). From Image Deblurring to Optimal Investments: Maximum Likelihood Solutions for Positive Linear Inverse Problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01925.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.