The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Canonical Correlation Analysis When the Data are Curves
Abstract
SUMMARY: It is not immediately straightforward to extend canonical correlation analysis to the context of functional data analysis, where the data are themselves curves or functions. The obvious approach breaks down, and it is necessary to use a method involving smoothing in some way. Such a method is introduced and discussed with reference to a data set on human gait. The breakdown of the unsmoothed method is illustrated in a practical context and is demonstrated theoretically. A consistency theorem for the smoothed method is proved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome
Koenig, J. E., Spor, A., Scalfone, N., Fricker, A. D., Stombaugh, J., Knight, R., Angenent, L. T., & Ley, R. E. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000081107 · Cited by 2,540
Metadata
- Authors
- Leurgans, S. E., Moyeed, R. A., & Silverman, B. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-07-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 725-740
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W1601511468
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
