Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,749

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wavelet Shrinkage: Asymptopia?

Donoho, David L., Johnstone, Iain M., Kerkyacharian, Gérard, Picard, Dominique·1995·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Much recent effort has sought asymptotically minimax methods for recovering infinite dimensional objects—curves, densities, spectral densities, images—from noisy data. A now rich and complex body of work develops nearly or exactly minimax estimators for an array of interesting problems. Unfortunately, the results have rarely moved into practice, for a variety of reasons—among them being similarity to known methods, computational intractability and lack of spatial adaptivity. We discuss a method for curve estimation based on n noisy data: translate the empirical wavelet coefficients towards the origin by an amount √(2 log n)σ/√n. The proposal differs from those in current use, is computationally practical and is spatially adaptive; it thus avoids several of the previous objections. Further, the method is nearly minimax both for a wide variety of loss functions—pointwise error, global error measured in Lp-norms, pointwise and global error in estimation of derivatives—and for a wide range of smoothness classes, including standard Holder and Sobolev classes, and bounded variation. This is a much broader near optimality than anything previously proposed: we draw loose parallels with near optimality in robustness and also with the broad near eigenfunction properties of wavelets themselves. Finally, the theory underlying the method is interesting, as it exploits a correspondence between statistical questions and questions of optimal recovery and information-based complexity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02032.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,749

Metadata

Authors
Donoho, D. L., Johnstone, I. M., Kerkyacharian, G., & Picard, D.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
301-337
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W191129667
Cited by
1,749
References
3
FWCI
57.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wavelet Shrinkage: Asymptopia? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02032.x
The paper
Donoho, D. L., Johnstone, I. M., Kerkyacharian, G., & Picard, D. (1995). Wavelet Shrinkage: Asymptopia? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02032.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.