Influence of Temperature and Material Deposit on Material Removal Uniformity during Optical Pad Polishing
Abstract
The effects of temperature and material deposit on workpiece material removal spatial uniformity during optical pad polishing are described. Round and square‐fused silica workpieces (25–265 mm in size) were polished on a polyurethane pad using ceria slurry under various conditions. Using a nonrotated workpiece on a rotating lap, elevated temperatures (as measured by IR imaging), due to frictional heating at the workpiece–lap interface, were observed having a largely radial symmetric profile (relative to the lap center) on both the workpiece and lap with a peak temperature corresponding to the workpiece center. A 3D steady‐state thermal model of the polishing process, which accounts for the frictional heating and effective heat transfer from various surfaces, quantitatively describes the observed thermal profiles. The temperature spatial uniformity, which affects the material removal spatial uniformity, can be significantly improved using a rotated workpiece and a specially designed compensating septum during polishing. Next, using a rotating workpiece and lap, the workpiece surface develops two types of mid‐range structure: (1) fine ripples (sub‐mm scale length) that run circumferentially with respect to the lap, which have been attributed to microscopic islands of slurry on the lap leading to radial material removal nonuniformities; and (2) a center depression (cm scale length) which has been attributed to nonlinear slurry & glass products buildup at a specific radial lap location. A polishing simulator model (called Surface Figure or SurF), which accounts for workpiece wear, pad wear, and now deposition on the pad, correctly simulates the preferential material deposit on the pad and the center depression structure developed on the workpiece. Strategies, such as time averaging through kinematics and diamond conditioning, for preventing both these nonuniformities are demonstrated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A similar effect of removal rate reduction with increase in tool rotation rate was observed with the hemispherical pad/foam sub-aperture tool polishing.
“A similar effect of removal rate reduction with increase in Rt was observed with the hemispherical pad/foam sub-aperture tool polishing.[36]”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
The kinematics used for each experiment were largely kept the same, and analysis of the time average velocity distribution suggests uniform removal over the workpiece as long as a given workpiece location experiences the full set of tool contact overlaps.
“The kinematics used for each of the experiments were largely kept the same, and the analysis of the time average velocity distribution suggests uniform removal over the workpiece as long as a given workpiece location experiences the full set of tool contact overlaps (see [36] for details).”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Using a vector based kinematics analysis described previously, the time average velocity, using the parameters described above with full overlap the tool diameter, varies spatially only 5.9% in one of the linear direction.
“Using a vector based kinematics analysis described previously [36], the time average velocity, using the parameters described above with full overlap the tool diameter, varies spatially only 5.9% in one of the linear direction.”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
Suratwala, T., Tham, G., Steele, R., Wong, L., Menapace, J., Ray, N., & Bauman, B. (2023) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.482739 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Suratwala, T., Feit, M. D., Steele, W. A., & Wong, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Suratwala, Tayyab
- Venue
- Journal of the American Ceramic Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1720-1727
- ISSN
- 0002-7820 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2115287183
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Ceramic Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DE-AC52-07NA27344)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- material removal uniformity, temperature uniformity, frictional heating, fused silica, ceria slurry, polyurethane polishing pad, 3D thermal model, rotating workpiece, slurry deposition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review