The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Colloidal processing: enabling complex shaped ceramics with unique multiscale structures
Open accessAbstract
Colloidal processing of fine ceramic powders enables the production of complex shaped ceramics with unique micro and macro structures which are not possible to produce via conventional dry processing routes. Because of this enhanced structural control and shaping capabilities, colloidal processing has been exploited to produce ceramic components with ever increasing complexity and functionalities. In this review, we revisit some of the research efforts on this topic to highlight its relevance and growing importance for the advanced manufacturing of functional ceramics. Selected examples of colloidal systems with increasing level of complexity are discussed to showcase the wide range of structures that can be generated through wet processing approaches. The historical development and background knowledge pertaining to colloids and surface interactions is first briefly reviewed. The major colloidal shape forming and additive manufacturing processes that utilize colloidal pastes and inks are then reviewed, highlighting the control of suspension rheology needed in these techniques. Next, methodologies that combine suspended particles with a pore‐forming phase are discussed as a means to produce porous ceramic materials. Further control over the interactions between anisotropic particles and their alignment in suspensions can be gained via externally applied fields (such as magnetic) to produce texturally aligned green bodies. This leads to bioinspired ceramics that can programmably morph into complex shaped objects upon sintering. Hierarchical porous structures with high mechanical efficiency are also shown as an example of the multiscale designs that can be generated through advanced colloidal processing. As drying of ceramic bodies is an inevitable consequence of wet colloidal processing, the current understanding of this critical processing step is reviewed. Finally, the gaps in knowledge in these fields are discussed to provide our perspective on where the field may support advances in ceramics in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sydney Gladman, A., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L., & Lewis, J. A. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4544 · Cited by 3,027
Freeze‐Casting of Porous Ceramics: A Review of Current Achievements and Issues
Deville, S. (2008) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.200700270 · Cited by 1,260
Cited by
Zhou, S., Liu, G., Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Yan, C., & Shi, Y. (2024) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112632 · Cited by 150
Li, J., Zhang, C., Yin, R., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Ceramics International · doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.118 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Franks, G. V., Tallon, C., Studart, A. R., Sesso, M. L., & Leo, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Ceramic Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 458-490
- ISSN
- 0002-7820 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2582149999
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colloidal processing: enabling complex shaped ceramics with unique multiscale structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jace.14705
- The paper
- Franks, G. V., Tallon, C., Studart, A. R., Sesso, M. L., & Leo, S. (2017). Colloidal processing: enabling complex shaped ceramics with unique multiscale structures. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14705
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.