Cited by 108Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationTeam Dynamics and Performance

Understanding interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management for older adults living in communities: a concept analysis

Bookey‐Bassett, Sue, Markle‐Reid, Maureen, Mckey, Colleen A., Akhtar‐Danesh, Noori·2017·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim To report a concept analysis of interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management, for older adults living in communities. Background Increasing prevalence of chronic disease among older adults is creating significant burden for patients, families and healthcare systems. Managing chronic disease for older adults living in the community requires interprofessional collaboration across different health and other care providers, organizations and sectors. However, there is a lack of consensus about the definition and use of interprofessional collaboration for community-based chronic disease management. Design Concept analysis. Data sources Electronic databases CINAHL, Medline, HealthStar, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Ageline and Cochrane Database were searched from 2000 - 2013. Methods Rodgers' evolutionary method for concept analysis. Results The most common surrogate term was interdisciplinary collaboration. Related terms were interprofessional team, multidisciplinary team and teamwork. Attributes included: an evolving interpersonal process; shared goals, decision-making and care planning; interdependence; effective and frequent communication; evaluation of team processes; involving older adults and family members in the team; and diverse and flexible team membership. Antecedents comprised: role awareness; interprofessional education; trust between team members; belief that interprofessional collaboration improves care; and organizational support. Consequen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.13162

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient is placed in a central role within the collaborative health care team, with improved patient care typically being the primary outcome or objective of IPC.

    “Patient is placed in a central role within the collaborative health care team, with improved patient care typically being the primary outcome or objective of IPC (Bookey-Bassett et al. 2016; Kobrai-Abkenar et al. 2024).”

    From Leadership of Nurses' Interprofessional Collaboration: A Mixed‐Methods Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Bookey-Bassett et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bookey‐Bassett, S., Markle‐Reid, M., Mckey, C. A., & Akhtar‐Danesh, N.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bookey‐Bassett, Sue
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-17
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
71-84
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2524553079
Cited by
108
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
interprofessional collaboration, chronic disease management, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, interdisciplinary collaboration, interprofessional education, teamwork, care planning, team communication, interprofessional trust, organizational support, nursing practice
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Management, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review