Understanding interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management for older adults living in communities: a concept analysis
Abstract
Aim To report a concept analysis of interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management, for older adults living in communities. Background Increasing prevalence of chronic disease among older adults is creating significant burden for patients, families and healthcare systems. Managing chronic disease for older adults living in the community requires interprofessional collaboration across different health and other care providers, organizations and sectors. However, there is a lack of consensus about the definition and use of interprofessional collaboration for community-based chronic disease management. Design Concept analysis. Data sources Electronic databases CINAHL, Medline, HealthStar, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Ageline and Cochrane Database were searched from 2000 - 2013. Methods Rodgers' evolutionary method for concept analysis. Results The most common surrogate term was interdisciplinary collaboration. Related terms were interprofessional team, multidisciplinary team and teamwork. Attributes included: an evolving interpersonal process; shared goals, decision-making and care planning; interdependence; effective and frequent communication; evaluation of team processes; involving older adults and family members in the team; and diverse and flexible team membership. Antecedents comprised: role awareness; interprofessional education; trust between team members; belief that interprofessional collaboration improves care; and organizational support. Consequen…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient is placed in a central role within the collaborative health care team, with improved patient care typically being the primary outcome or objective of IPC.
“Patient is placed in a central role within the collaborative health care team, with improved patient care typically being the primary outcome or objective of IPC (Bookey-Bassett et al. 2016; Kobrai-Abkenar et al. 2024).”
From Leadership of Nurses' Interprofessional Collaboration: A Mixed‐Methods Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Bookey-Bassett et al. 2016
Cites
Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses
Katon, W. J., Lin, E. H. B., Von Korff, M., Ciechanowski, P., Ludman, E. J., Young, B., Peterson, D., Rutter, C. M., McGregor, M., & McCulloch, D. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1003955 · Cited by 1,697 · see citing works
Xyrichis, A., & Lowton, K. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.015 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart Speakers for Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Review
Dino, M. J., Leinbach, C., Dino, G., Thiamwong, L., Villafuerte, C. M., Shattell, M., Pimentel, J., Zamora, M. A., Bautista, A., Vitug, J. P., et al. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13212772 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Leadership of Nurses' Interprofessional Collaboration: A Mixed‐Methods Systematic Review
Kamppila, H., Czabanowska, K., Kämäräinen, P., Younas, A., & Kvist, T. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70543 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bookey‐Bassett, S., Markle‐Reid, M., Mckey, C. A., & Akhtar‐Danesh, N.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bookey‐Bassett, Sue
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-10-17
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-84
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2524553079
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- interprofessional collaboration, chronic disease management, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, interdisciplinary collaboration, interprofessional education, teamwork, care planning, team communication, interprofessional trust, organizational support, nursing practice
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Management, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review