ChatGTP: What is it and how can nursing and health science education use it?
Open accessAbstract
ChatGTP: What is it and how
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ChatGPT is an easily accessible low-cost platform capable of suggesting CDM processes and supporting novices throughout their clinical practice as a consultant.
“ChatGPT is an easily accessible low‐cost platform capable of suggesting CDM processes and supporting novices throughout their clinical practice as a consultant (Archibald & Clark, 2023).”
From A comparative vignette study: Evaluating the potential role of a generative <scp>AI</scp> model in enhancing clinical <scp>decision‐making</scp> in nursing (2025) · cites this paper as Archibald & Clark, 2023
Section 1 (“What is ChatGPT?”) describes ChatGPT as free to use and capable of responding to prompts, supporting the accessible, low-cost part of the claim. Sections 1 and 4 discuss educational uses and the need for guidance, but do not say it suggests clinical decision-making processes or serves as a consultant to novices throughout clinical practice. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIntegrative implementations actively incorporate GenAI as a learning tool with structured guidelines for practical use and critical evaluation.
“Integrative imple mentations actively incorporate GenAI as a learning tool with structured guidelines for practical use and critical evaluation”
From Patterns, advances, and gaps in using ChatGPT and similar technologies in nursing education: A PAGER scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as Archibald and Clark, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 6 · Cited by 71
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- T WIT TER Mandy M. Archibald @Mandy_Archibald Alexander M. Clark @DrAlexMClark R E FE R E N C E S Archibald, M., & Barnard, A. (2018). Futurism in nursing: Technology, ro- botics and the fundamentals of care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, Special Issue Fundamental Care, 27, 11-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14081 · DOI
- Archibald, M., & Clark, A. M. (2014). Twitter and nursing research: How diffusion of innovation theory can help uptake. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(3), e3-e5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12343 · DOI
- Fasano, N. F., & White, M. J. (1982). Futurism scenario: Commencement address to the class of 2010. Journal of Nursing Education, 21, 20-25. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19820 301-05. · DOI
- Graham, F. (2022). Daily briefing: Will ChatGPT kill the essay assign- ment? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d4158 6-022-04437 -2 · DOI · Paper page
- Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for students. Routledge.
- Authors
- Archibald, M. M., & Clark, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Athabasca University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Archibald, Mandy M.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-21
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3648-3651
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W4328047979
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, generative AI, nursing education, health science education, AI in teaching
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Graduate, Health Education, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
