Cited by 52Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Development of Sediment and Nutrient Export Coefficients for U.S. Ecoregions

White, Michael, Harmel, Daren, Yen, Haw, Arnold, Jeff, Gambone, Marilyn, Haney, Richard·2015·JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Abstract

Water quality impairment due to excessive nutrients and sediment is a major problem in the United States ( U.S. ). An important step in the mitigation of impairment in any given water body is determination of pollutant sources and amount. The sheer number of impaired waters and limited resources makes simplistic load estimation methods such as export coefficient (EC) methods attractive. Unfortunately ECs are typically based on small watershed monitoring data, which are very limited and/or often based on data collected from distant watersheds with drastically different conditions. In this research, we seek to improve the accuracy of these nutrient export estimation methods by developing a national database of localized EC for each ecoregion in the U.S. A stochastic sampling methodology loosely based on the Monte‐Carlo technique was used to construct a database of 45 million Soil and Water Assessment Tool ( SWAT ) simulations. These simulations consider a variety of climate, topography, soils, weather, land use, management, and conservation implementation conditions. SWAT model simulations were successfully validated with edge‐of‐field monitoring data. Simulated nutrient ECs compared favorably with previously published studies. These ECs may be used to rapidly estimate nutrient loading for any small catchment in the U.S. provided the location, area, and land‐use distribution are known.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jawr.12270

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, M., Harmel, D., Yen, H., Arnold, J., Gambone, M., & Haney, R.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Blackland Research & Extension Center Texas A&M AgriLife Research Temple Texas 76502
Venue
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-30
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
758-775
ISSN
  • 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1688
OpenAlex
W1978769119
Cited by
52
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Agricultural Research Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
ecoregions, SWAT model simulation, Monte Carlo sampling, water quality degradation, land use and management, conservation practices, small watersheds, national database

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review