The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data in Supply Chain Management: Current State and Future Potential
Abstract
While data science, predictive analytics, and big data have been frequently used buzzwords, rigorous academic investigations into these areas are just emerging. In this forward thinking article, we discuss the results of a recent large‐scale survey on these topics among supply chain management (SCM) professionals, complemented with our experiences in developing, implementing, and administering one of the first master's degree programs in predictive analytics. As such, we effectively provide an assessment of the current state of the field via a large‐scale survey, and offer insight into its future potential via the discussion of how a research university is training next‐generation data scientists. Specifically, we report on the current use of predictive analytics in SCM and the underlying motivations, as well as perceived benefits and barriers. In addition, we highlight skills desired for successful data scientists, and provide illustrations of how predictive analytics can be implemented in the curriculum. Relying on one of the largest data sets of predictive analytics users in SCM collected to date and our experiences with one of the first master's degree programs in predictive analytics, it is our intent to provide a timely assessment of the field, illustrate its future potential, and motivate additional research and pedagogical advancements in this domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018 · Cited by 863
Cited by
Digital Supply Chain: Literature review and a proposed framework for future research
Büyüközkan, G., & Göçer, F. (2018) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.02.010 · Cited by 1,205
Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., Wamba, S. F., & Roubaud, D. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020 · Cited by 860
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12343 · Cited by 835
Big data analytics in supply chain management between 2010 and 2016: Insights to industries
Tiwari, S., Wee, H. M., & Daryanto, Y. (2018) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.017 · Cited by 582
Arunachalam, D., Kumar, N., & Kawalek, J. P. (2018) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.001 · Cited by 535
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoenherr, T., & Speier‐Pero, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Logistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-132
- ISSN
- 0735-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-1592
- OpenAlex
- W2024237844
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 80.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.