The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Supply Chain Management: In the Past, Present, and Future
Abstract
The article titled “Defining Supply Chain Management” published in 2001 in the Journal of Business Logistics has been cited over 4,900 times in the last 17 years. In this paper, we first provide a historical review of how the article originated and the contributions the article made to both the theory and practice of supply chain management (SCM). Next, we highlight the key market and technological changes that have emerged in SCM followed by how the theory proposed in the 2001 article can still be relevant to support SCM research and practice going forward. We also propose ways of configuring a supply chain and partnering across companies to serve customers in an optimal way. We conclude with a call for research on developing new frameworks to better describe, explain, predict, and shed light on the evolving nature of SCM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors affecting trust in market research relationships
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700106 · Cited by 3,659
Welcome to the experience economy.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 3,094
Welcome to the experience economy
Benneworth, P. (2019) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 2,568
(2016) · Springer Handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1 · Cited by 2,122
Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers
Forrester, J. W. (2012) · The Roots of Logistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27922-5_13 · Cited by 2,058
(2017) · Cited by 1,724
Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12010 · Cited by 1,522
Gibbs, J. P., & Coleman, J. S. (1990) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579680 · Cited by 950
A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology
Mooney, J. G., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (1996) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/243350.243363 · Cited by 519
Demand and supply integration: a conceptual framework of value creation through knowledge management
Esper, T. L., Ellinger, A. E., Stank, T. P., Flint, D. J., & Moon, M. (2010) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-009-0135-3 · Cited by 336
Cited by
The role of big data for Supply Chain 4.0 in manufacturing organisations of developing countries
Narwane, V. S., Raut, R. D., Yadav, V. S., Cheikhrouhou, N., Narkhede, B. E., & Priyadarshinee, P. (2021) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-11-2020-0463 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Min, S., Zacharia, Z. G., & Smith, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Logistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-55
- ISSN
- 0735-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-1592
- OpenAlex
- W2920221770
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 46.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Supply Chain Management: In the Past, Present, and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jbl.12201
- The paper
- Min, S., Zacharia, Z. G., & Smith, C. D. (2019). Defining Supply Chain Management: In the Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Business Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
