STRIDE BP international initiative for accurate blood pressure measurement: Systematic review of published validation studies of blood pressure measuring devices
Open accessAbstract
Blood pressure (BP) is a vital sign, and its measurement is essential for diagnosing and treating hypertension. The accuracy of BP monitors is therefore essential, but unfortunately very few devices available on the market have been validated using an established protocol. STRIDE BP (www.stridebp.org) is an international nonprofit organization with the mission to improve the accuracy of BP measurement and the diagnosis of hypertension. It has a prestigious Scientific Advisory Board and operates in affiliation with the European Society of Hypertension, the International Society of Hypertension, and the World Hypertension League. STRIDE BP provides lists of accurate office, ambulatory, and home BP monitors. STRIDE BP performed a systematic review of 419 published validations (270 articles and 260 devices). In these publications, 50 (12%) of the validations were rejected compared with 129 (31%) rejected by STRIDE BP (P < .001). Of 79 validations approved in publications but rejected by STRIDE BP, 7 (9%) were rejected due to device inaccuracy and 72 (91%) due to inadequate study quality (execution, analysis, and reporting). Errors in conducting and reporting published validations must be avoided. Peer review must ascertain that a comprehensive checklist of all aspects of a validation study have been adhered to. The implementation of a Universal Standard for device validation and the global dissemination of information on accurate devices by STRIDE BP are expected to improve the quality and accuracy of BP measurement, which should have a positive impact on the diagnosis and management of hypertension globally.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The clinical application and accuracy of HBPM may be limited by conditions related to the individual, the procedure, the oscillometric technique, or cuff-related issues.
“the clinical application and the accuracy of HBPM may be limited by certain conditions related either to the individual [63–66], to the procedure itself [4,67], to the oscillometric technique for BP measurement or to cuff-related issues [4,65,68–74].”
The clinical application and accuracy of HBPM may be limited by conditions related to the individual, the procedure, the oscillometric technique, or cuff-related issues.
“the clinical application and the accuracy of HBPM may be limited by certain conditions related either to the individual [63–66], to the procedure itself [4,67], to the oscillometric technique for BP measurement or to cuff-related issues [4,65,68–74].”
Most devices available on the market have not been subjected to independent validation using one of the established protocols.
“Unfortunately, most of the devices available on the market have not been subjected to independent validation using one of these protocols [69,87–89].”
Cites
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
Goldacre, B., Drysdale, H., Dale, A., Milosevic, I., Slade, E., Hartley, P., Marston, C., Powell-Smith, A., Heneghan, C., & Mahtani, K. R. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473 · see citing works
Self-citation2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension
McEvoy, J. W., McCarthy, C. P., Bruno, R. M., Brouwers, S., Canavan, M. D., Ceconi, C., Christodorescu, R. M., Daskalopoulou, S. S., Ferro, C. J., Gerdts, E., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae178 · Cited by 2,298 · see citing works
Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques
Schutte, A. E., Kollias, A., & Stergiou, G. S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00690-0 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citationParati, G., Stergiou, G. S., Bilo, G., Kollias, A., Pengo, M., Ochoa, J. E., Agarwal, R., Asayama, K., Asmar, R., Burnier, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002922 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman Errors in Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement: Still Room for Improvement
Elias, M. F., & Goodell, A. L. (2021) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16164 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stergiou, G. S., O'Brien, E., Myers, M., Palatini, P., Parati, G., Kollias, A., Birmpas, D., Kyriakoulis, K., Bountzona, I., Stambolliu, E., Anagnostopoulos, I., Karpettas, N., Menti, A., & the STRIDE BP Scientific Advisory Board
- Affiliations
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- University of Padua (IT)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
- Hypertension Center STRIDE‐7 School of Medicine Third Department of Medicine Sotiria Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
- European University Cyprus (CY)
- Corresponding author
- Stergiou, George S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1616-1622
- ISSN
- 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7176
- PMC
- PMC8030378
- OpenAlex
- W2981867075
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- blood pressure measurement, blood pressure monitors, device validation, hypertension diagnosis, home blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, office blood pressure measurement, validation standards
- MeSH terms
- Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, Reproducibility of Results, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review