Cited by 53Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringClinical practice guidelines implementation

STRIDE BP international initiative for accurate blood pressure measurement: Systematic review of published validation studies of blood pressure measuring devices

Open access
Stergiou, George S., O'Brien, Eoin, Myers, Martin, Palatini, Paolo, Parati, Gianfranco, Kollias, Anastasios, Birmpas, Dimos, Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos +6 more·2019·The Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is a vital sign, and its measurement is essential for diagnosing and treating hypertension. The accuracy of BP monitors is therefore essential, but unfortunately very few devices available on the market have been validated using an established protocol. STRIDE BP (www.stridebp.org) is an international nonprofit organization with the mission to improve the accuracy of BP measurement and the diagnosis of hypertension. It has a prestigious Scientific Advisory Board and operates in affiliation with the European Society of Hypertension, the International Society of Hypertension, and the World Hypertension League. STRIDE BP provides lists of accurate office, ambulatory, and home BP monitors. STRIDE BP performed a systematic review of 419 published validations (270 articles and 260 devices). In these publications, 50 (12%) of the validations were rejected compared with 129 (31%) rejected by STRIDE BP (P < .001). Of 79 validations approved in publications but rejected by STRIDE BP, 7 (9%) were rejected due to device inaccuracy and 72 (91%) due to inadequate study quality (execution, analysis, and reporting). Errors in conducting and reporting published validations must be avoided. Peer review must ascertain that a comprehensive checklist of all aspects of a validation study have been adhered to. The implementation of a Universal Standard for device validation and the global dissemination of information on accurate devices by STRIDE BP are expected to improve the quality and accuracy of BP measurement, which should have a positive impact on the diagnosis and management of hypertension globally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jch.13710

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stergiou, G. S., O'Brien, E., Myers, M., Palatini, P., Parati, G., Kollias, A., Birmpas, D., Kyriakoulis, K., Bountzona, I., Stambolliu, E., Anagnostopoulos, I., Karpettas, N., Menti, A., & the STRIDE BP Scientific Advisory Board
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
  • Hypertension Center STRIDE‐7 School of Medicine Third Department of Medicine Sotiria Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
  • European University Cyprus (CY)
Corresponding author
Stergiou, George S.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-26
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1616-1622
ISSN
  • 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7176
OpenAlex
W2981867075
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
blood pressure measurement, blood pressure monitors, device validation, hypertension diagnosis, home blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, office blood pressure measurement, validation standards
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, Reproducibility of Results, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review