The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post‐Maastricht Era

Abstract

The post‐M aastricht period is marked by an integration paradox. While the basic constitutional features of the E uropean Union have remained stable, EU activity has expanded to an unprecedented degree. This form of integration without supranationalism is no exception or temporary deviation from traditional forms of E uropean integration. Rather, it is a distinct phase of E uropean integration, what is called ‘the new intergovernmentalism’ in this article. This approach to post‐M aastricht integration challenges theories that associate integration with transfers of competences from national capitals to supranational institutions and those that reduce integration to traditional socioeconomic or security‐driven interests. This article explains the integration paradox in terms of transformations in E urope's political economy, changes in preference formation and the decline of the ‘permissive consensus’. It presents a set of six hypotheses that develop further the main claims of the new intergovernmentalism and that can be used as a basis for future research.