The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The EU's China Strategies: A Hedging Framework for Analysis
Open accessAbstract
By drawing on the concept of hedging, this article develops an analytical framework that conceptualises and explains adjustments in the EU's China strategies since the end of the Cold War. It argues that the EU's China strategy shifted from co‐operative to extensive hedging in the post‐Cold War era and shifted from extensive to conflictive hedging in a new US–China bipolar system. Divided into four parts, the article first notes that despite a contemporary US–China bipolar system, the EU has maintained a general strategy of hedging towards China. The second part of the article defines and conceptualises hedging and provides a hedging framework for analysis based on three different types of hedging strategies. The third part explains the shift in the EU's China strategy from co‐operative to extensive hedging in the post‐Cold War era. The fourth part contends that the EU has adjusted from extensive to conflictive hedging in a new US–China bipolar system. The conclusion notes that the Soviet Union posed an overwhelming threat to Western Europe during the previous bipolar system, which compelled the European Economic Community towards containment and balancing. China represents much more of a risk than a threat to the EU in the new bipolar system, which allows the EU to sustain a hedging strategy and prioritise de‐risking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 97
- 10.1057/978-1-137-57486-2 · DOI
- 10.1515/9780804767422-011 · DOI
- 10.1080/13501763.2013.781781 · DOI
- Beck U.(1996) ‘World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society? Ecological Questions in a Framework of Manufactured Uncertainties’.https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276496013004001 · DOI · Paper page
- Beck U., 1998, Environmentalism. Critical Concepts, 256
- Beckley M.C., 2018, Unrivaled: Why the United States Will Remain the World's Sole Superpower
- 10.4324/9781003007746 · DOI
- Brealey R.A., 2003, Financing and Risk Management
- Caffrey K., 2011, The Beijing Olympics: Promoting China. Soft and Hard Power in Global Politics
- 10.1162/isec_a_00473 · DOI
- Chhabra T.Doshi R.Hass R.andKimball E.(2020) ‘Global China Technology’. Brookings Report April.https://www.brookings.edu/articles/global‐china‐technology/ · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230378704 · DOI
- 10.5509/2009824657 · DOI
- 10.1093/irap/lcz017 · DOI
- Coker C., 2009, War in an Age of Risk
- 10.1111/jcms.12902 · DOI
- 10.1093/rfs/11.4.739 · DOI
- 10.1080/00396338.2023.2239059 · DOI
- Duffie D., 1989, Future Markets
- 10.1111/jcms.13604 · DOI
- 10.1080/0963-640291906735 · DOI
- European Commission, 1995, Communication from the Commission: A Long Term Policy for China‐Europe Relations
- European Commission, 2019, EU‐China—A Strategic Outlook
- European Parliament, 2020, EU‐China Trade and Investments Relations in Challenging Times
- 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00516.x · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.13259 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02194.x · DOI
- 10.7591/cornell/9781501709180.003.0009 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.13593 · DOI
- Friedberg A.L., 2011, A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle For Mastery in Asia
- 10.4324/9781003212164 · DOI
- Giddens A., 1998, Conversations With Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity
- 10.1093/oso/9780199218677.003.0015 · DOI
- Goh E., 2005, Meeting the China Challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies
- 10.1111/jcms.13539 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.13591 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.13596 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.13527 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203970072 · DOI
- 10.1002/polq.12430 · DOI
- 10.1093/irap/lcu005 · DOI
- 10.2307/2296076 · DOI
- Kennedy P., 1987, The Rise and the Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict From 1500 to 2000
- Khalilzad Z.(1999) ‘Congage China’. Issue Paper RAND Project Air Force. · DOI
- Koga K., 2018, The Concept of “Hedging” Revisited: The Case of Japan's Foreign Policy Strategy in East Asia's Power Shift, International Studies Review, 20, 633
- 10.1355/CS30-2A · DOI
- 10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714 · DOI
- 10.1111/aspp.12240 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11366-022-09792-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-2346.12655 · DOI
- 10.1080/09636412.2015.1103130 · DOI
- 10.1162/isec_a_00494 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-5965.00353 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jcms.13505 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00484.x · DOI
- Mearsheimer J.J., 2001, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
- 10.1162/016366005774859724 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.12172 · DOI
- Miller C., 2022, Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
- Morgenthau H.J., 1948, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace
- Morgenthau H.J., 1954, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace
- 10.4324/9781315167466 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcms.12650 · DOI
- 10.1080/03932720802280594 · DOI
- 10.1080/13501763.2021.1918216 · DOI
- 10.1162/016228803322427965 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511491634 · DOI
- Ross R.S., 2017, China, the United States and the East Asian Order: International Security and Domestic Politics
- 10.4324/9781003056683 · DOI
- Rühlig T. N. BjörnJerdén Frans‐Paulvan derPutten JohnSeaman MiguelOtero‐IglesiasandAliceEkman(eds.) (2018) ‘Political Values in Europe‐China Relations’. A Report by the European Think‐Tank Network on China (ETNC). December.https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2019‐01/full‐report_2019.pdf
- 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02127.x · DOI
- Samuels R., 2007, Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia
- 10.1080/03932729.2013.788378 · DOI
- 10.1177/0047117815588117 · DOI
- 10.1111/1758-5899.12862 · DOI
- Solana J., 2003, A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy
- Subramanian A., 2011, Eclipse: Living in the Shadow of China's Economic Dominance
- Sutter R.G., 2006, China's Rise: Implications for US Leadership in Asia, 1
- Swaine M.D., 2011, America's Challenge: Engaging a Rising China in the Twenty‐First Century
- 10.1093/ia/iiz227 · DOI
- 10.1057/s41311‐019‐00182‐y · DOI
- 10.1177/1354066116634175 · DOI
- 10.54648/EERR2010014 · DOI
- 10.1080/07036337.2014.886401 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203930359 · DOI
- Tunsjø Ø., 2013, Security and Profit in China's Energy Policy: Hedging Against Risk
- 10.1007/978-3-319-10034-0_8 · DOI
- Tunsjø Ø., 2017, Strategic Adjustments and the Rise of China: Power and Politics in East Asia, 41
- 10.7312/tuns17654 · DOI
- 10.1093/9780197799932.003.0004 · DOI
- US Department of Defense. (2006) ‘Quadrennial Defense Review Report’. Washington DC. 6 February.
- 10.1353/apr.2014.0008 · DOI
- Waltz K.N., 1979, Theory of International Politics
- Wang D., 2017, Strategic Adjustments and the Rise of China: Power and Politics in East Asia, 100
- 10.1163/9789004273917_008 · DOI
- 10.1093/cjip/pou027 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Tunsjø, Ø.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Defence University College (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Tunsjø, Øystein
- ORCID
- Tunsjø, Øystein
- Venue
- JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-05-20
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 956-979
- ISSN
- 0021-9886 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5965
- OpenAlex
- W4410520795
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Defense
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Keywords
- EU-China relations, hedging strategies, European Economic Community, de-risking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review