Cited by 7International Relations and Foreign PolicyEuropean Politics and SecurityEuropean Union Policy and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The EU's China Strategies: A Hedging Framework for Analysis

Open access
Tunsjø, Øystein·2026·JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies

Abstract

By drawing on the concept of hedging, this article develops an analytical framework that conceptualises and explains adjustments in the EU's China strategies since the end of the Cold War. It argues that the EU's China strategy shifted from co‐operative to extensive hedging in the post‐Cold War era and shifted from extensive to conflictive hedging in a new US–China bipolar system. Divided into four parts, the article first notes that despite a contemporary US–China bipolar system, the EU has maintained a general strategy of hedging towards China. The second part of the article defines and conceptualises hedging and provides a hedging framework for analysis based on three different types of hedging strategies. The third part explains the shift in the EU's China strategy from co‐operative to extensive hedging in the post‐Cold War era. The fourth part contends that the EU has adjusted from extensive to conflictive hedging in a new US–China bipolar system. The conclusion notes that the Soviet Union posed an overwhelming threat to Western Europe during the previous bipolar system, which compelled the European Economic Community towards containment and balancing. China represents much more of a risk than a threat to the EU in the new bipolar system, which allows the EU to sustain a hedging strategy and prioritise de‐risking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcms.13749

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. 10.1057/978-1-137-57486-2 · DOI
  2. 10.1515/9780804767422-011 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/13501763.2013.781781 · DOI
  4. Beck U.(1996) ‘World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society? Ecological Questions in a Framework of Manufactured Uncertainties’.https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276496013004001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beck U., 1998, Environmentalism. Critical Concepts, 256
  6. Beckley M.C., 2018, Unrivaled: Why the United States Will Remain the World's Sole Superpower
  7. 10.4324/9781003007746 · DOI
  8. Brealey R.A., 2003, Financing and Risk Management
  9. Caffrey K., 2011, The Beijing Olympics: Promoting China. Soft and Hard Power in Global Politics
  10. 10.1162/isec_a_00473 · DOI
  11. Chhabra T.Doshi R.Hass R.andKimball E.(2020) ‘Global China Technology’. Brookings Report April.https://www.brookings.edu/articles/global‐china‐technology/ · DOI
  12. 10.1057/9780230378704 · DOI
  13. 10.5509/2009824657 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/irap/lcz017 · DOI
  15. Coker C., 2009, War in an Age of Risk
  16. 10.1111/jcms.12902 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/rfs/11.4.739 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/00396338.2023.2239059 · DOI
  19. Duffie D., 1989, Future Markets
  20. 10.1111/jcms.13604 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/0963-640291906735 · DOI
  22. European Commission, 1995, Communication from the Commission: A Long Term Policy for China‐Europe Relations
  23. European Commission, 2019, EU‐China—A Strategic Outlook
  24. European Parliament, 2020, EU‐China Trade and Investments Relations in Challenging Times
  25. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00516.x · DOI
  26. 10.1111/jcms.13259 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02194.x · DOI
  28. 10.7591/cornell/9781501709180.003.0009 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/jcms.13593 · DOI
  30. Friedberg A.L., 2011, A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle For Mastery in Asia
  31. 10.4324/9781003212164 · DOI
  32. Giddens A., 1998, Conversations With Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity
  33. 10.1093/oso/9780199218677.003.0015 · DOI
  34. Goh E., 2005, Meeting the China Challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies
  35. 10.1111/jcms.13539 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/jcms.13591 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/jcms.13596 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/jcms.13527 · DOI
  40. 10.4324/9780203970072 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/polq.12430 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/irap/lcu005 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/2296076 · DOI
  44. Kennedy P., 1987, The Rise and the Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict From 1500 to 2000
  45. Khalilzad Z.(1999) ‘Congage China’. Issue Paper RAND Project Air Force. · DOI
  46. Koga K., 2018, The Concept of “Hedging” Revisited: The Case of Japan's Foreign Policy Strategy in East Asia's Power Shift, International Studies Review, 20, 633
  47. 10.1355/CS30-2A · DOI
  48. 10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/aspp.12240 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s11366-022-09792-5 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/1468-2346.12655 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/09636412.2015.1103130 · DOI
  53. 10.1162/isec_a_00494 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/1468-5965.00353 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1111/jcms.13505 · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00484.x · DOI
  57. Mearsheimer J.J., 2001, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
  58. 10.1162/016366005774859724 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/jcms.12172 · DOI
  60. Miller C., 2022, Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
  61. Morgenthau H.J., 1948, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace
  62. Morgenthau H.J., 1954, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace
  63. 10.4324/9781315167466 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/jcms.12650 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/03932720802280594 · DOI
  66. 10.1080/13501763.2021.1918216 · DOI
  67. 10.1162/016228803322427965 · DOI
  68. 10.1017/CBO9780511491634 · DOI
  69. Ross R.S., 2017, China, the United States and the East Asian Order: International Security and Domestic Politics
  70. 10.4324/9781003056683 · DOI
  71. Rühlig T. N. BjörnJerdén Frans‐Paulvan derPutten JohnSeaman MiguelOtero‐IglesiasandAliceEkman(eds.) (2018) ‘Political Values in Europe‐China Relations’. A Report by the European Think‐Tank Network on China (ETNC). December.https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2019‐01/full‐report_2019.pdf
  72. 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02127.x · DOI
  73. Samuels R., 2007, Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia
  74. 10.1080/03932729.2013.788378 · DOI
  75. 10.1177/0047117815588117 · DOI
  76. 10.1111/1758-5899.12862 · DOI
  77. Solana J., 2003, A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy
  78. Subramanian A., 2011, Eclipse: Living in the Shadow of China's Economic Dominance
  79. Sutter R.G., 2006, China's Rise: Implications for US Leadership in Asia, 1
  80. Swaine M.D., 2011, America's Challenge: Engaging a Rising China in the Twenty‐First Century
  81. 10.1093/ia/iiz227 · DOI
  82. 10.1057/s41311‐019‐00182‐y · DOI
  83. 10.1177/1354066116634175 · DOI
  84. 10.54648/EERR2010014 · DOI
  85. 10.1080/07036337.2014.886401 · DOI
  86. 10.4324/9780203930359 · DOI
  87. Tunsjø Ø., 2013, Security and Profit in China's Energy Policy: Hedging Against Risk
  88. 10.1007/978-3-319-10034-0_8 · DOI
  89. Tunsjø Ø., 2017, Strategic Adjustments and the Rise of China: Power and Politics in East Asia, 41
  90. 10.7312/tuns17654 · DOI
  91. 10.1093/9780197799932.003.0004 · DOI
  92. US Department of Defense. (2006) ‘Quadrennial Defense Review Report’. Washington DC. 6 February.
  93. 10.1353/apr.2014.0008 · DOI
  94. Waltz K.N., 1979, Theory of International Politics
  95. Wang D., 2017, Strategic Adjustments and the Rise of China: Power and Politics in East Asia, 100
  96. 10.1163/9789004273917_008 · DOI
  97. 10.1093/cjip/pou027 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tunsjø, Ø.
Affiliations
Norwegian Defence University College (NO)
Corresponding author
Tunsjø, Øystein
Venue
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-05-20
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
956-979
ISSN
  • 0021-9886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5965
OpenAlex
W4410520795
Cited by
7
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Defense
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
Keywords
EU-China relations, hedging strategies, European Economic Community, de-risking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review