The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Commentary: Understanding the impact of domestic violence on children, recognizing strengths, and promoting resilience: reflections on Harold and Sellers (2018)
Abstract
Violence and abuse in families occurs frequently with significant impact on children of all ages. However, this type of interpersonal violence is often the least disclosed or discussed. Therefore, the Harold and Sellers paper is important to bring attention to the broad range of both behavioral and neuroscience research in this area and the clinical implications for children and adolescents including risk for later psychopathology. The commentary also expands an understanding of the impact and outcomes for very young children exposed to domestic violence. The authors provide a thorough description of the many prevention and intervention programs and approaches to help children exposed to domestic violence. In conclusion, it is essential to recognize that even at times of adversity for children and families, such as when domestic violence occurs, it is important to recognize strengths and support resilience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Where children are part of family systems in which IPV is perpetrated, this poses additional risk of significant harm to both the child and the mother.
“where children are part of the family systems where IPV is being perpetrated, this poses additional risk of significant harm to both the child and mother (Devaney, 2015; Osofsky, 2018)”
From Global Prevalence and Mental Health Outcomes of Intimate Partner Violence Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Osofsky, 2018
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1007/s10896-007-9105-z · DOI
- Hamby S.L. Finkelhor D. Turner H. &Ormrod R.(2011).Children's Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence and other Family Violence Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention US Department of Justice. Available from:www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/232272.pdf[last accessed 4 February 2018]. · DOI
- 10.1177/0963721411435841 · DOI
- 10.1177/1524838013517563 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.247 · DOI
- 10.1037/vio0000131 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
White, S. J., Sin, J., Sweeney, A., Salisbury, T., Wahlich, C., Montesinos Guevara, C. M., Gillard, S., Brett, E., Allwright, L., Iqbal, N., et al. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380231155529 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Osofsky, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
- Corresponding author
- Osofsky, Joy D.
- ORCID
- Osofsky, Joy D.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-25
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-404
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W2796428767
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- domestic violence, children exposed to domestic violence, child resilience, strengths-based approach, psychopathology risk, very young children, prevention programs, intervention program, interpersonal violence
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Psychopathology, Domestic Violence, Family Conflict
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review