Clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs: Results from a Japanese cohort study (JDDM53)
Open accessAbstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Treatment intensification is commonly delayed in people with type 2 diabetes, resulting in poor glycemic control for an unacceptable length of time and increased risk of complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ) database. RESULTS: The median time from first reported glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) to treatment intensification was considerably longer and HbA1c levels were higher the more OADs the patient was exposed to. For patients receiving three OADs, the median times from HbA1c ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) to intensification with OAD, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or insulin were 8.1, 9.1 and 6.7 months, with a mean HbA1c level at the time of intensification of 8.4%, 8.9% and 9.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence for time since the first reported HbA1c ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) to intensification confirmed the existence of clinical inertia, identifying patients whose treatment was not intensified despite poor glycemic control. HbA1c levels ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) after ≥6 months on one, two or three OADs were observed in 42%, 51% and 58% of patients, respectively, showing that approximately 50% of patients are above HbA1c target regardless of how many OADs they take. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data here show clinical inertia in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes from early diabetes stages when they are receiving OADs, and illustrate a need for earlier, more effective OADs or injectable treatment intensification and better communication around the existence of clinical inertia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A retrospective study in Japan reported that approximately 50% of patients are above the HbA1c target levels for more than 6 months, regardless of how many OADs they took.
“The study reported that approximately 50% of patients are above the HbA1c target levels for more than 6 months, regardless of how many oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) they took [15].”
From Clinical Inertia in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 18
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- [2]Fong DS, Aiello LP, Ferris FL 3rd, et al. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2540– 2553. 15451934
- [3]Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10‐year follow‐up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1577– 1589. 18784090
- [4]Ray KK, Seshasai SR, Wijesuriya S, et al. Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2009; 373: 1765– 1772. 19465231
- [5]Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 405– 412. 10938048 PMC27454
- [6]Tanaka S, Tanaka S, Iimuro S, et al. Predicting macro‐ and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: the Japan Diabetes Complications Study/the Japanese Elderly Diabetes Intervention Trial risk engine. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 1193– 1199. 23404305 PMC3631823
- [7]Fonseca VA. Defining and characterizing the progression of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32(Suppl 2): S151– 156. 19875543 PMC2811457
- [8]American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes‐2019. Diabetes Care 2019; 42: S90– S102. 30559235
- [9]Haneda M, Noda M, Origasa H, et al. Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2016. J Diabetes Investig 2018; 9: 1– 45. PMC5934251 29582574
- [12]Association American Diabetes. Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes‐2019. Diabetes Care 2019; 42: S139– S147. 30559238
- [13]Khunti K, Millar‐Jones D. Clinical inertia to insulin initiation and intensification in the UK: A focused literature review. Prim Care Diabetes 2017; 11: 3– 12. 27727005
- [15]Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, et al. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 3411– 3417. 23877982 PMC3816889
- [16]Calvert MJ, McManus RJ, Freemantle N. Management of type 2 diabetes with multiple oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin in primary care: retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 455– 460. 17550670 PMC2078170
- [17]Costi M, Dilla T, Reviriego J, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the time of insulin initiation: INSTIGATE observational study in Spain. Acta Diabetol 2010; 47(Suppl 1): 169– 175. 19855919 PMC3003149
- [18]Rubino A, McQuay LJ, Gough SC, et al. Delayed initiation of subcutaneous insulin therapy after failure of oral glucose‐lowering agents in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a population‐based analysis in the UK. Diabet Med 2007; 24: 1412– 1418. 18042083
- [19]Kobayashi M, Yamazaki K, Hirao K, et al. The status of diabetes control and antidiabetic drug therapy in Japan–a cross‐sectional survey of 17,000 patients with diabetes mellitus (JDDM 1). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006; 73: 198– 204. 16621117
- [20]Oishi M, Yamazaki K, Okuguchi F, et al. Changes in oral antidiabetic prescriptions and improved glycemic control during the years 2002–2011 in Japan (JDDM32). J Diabetes Investig 2014; 5: 581– 587. PMC4188117 25411627
- [21]Satoh J, Andersen M, Bekker Hansen B, et al. Clinical inertia in basal insulin‐treated patients with type 2 diabetes ‐ Results from a retrospective database study in Japan (JDDM 43). PLoS One 2018; 13: e0198160. 30226870 PMC6143196
- [22]Khunti K, Damci T, Meneghini L, et al. Study of Once Daily Levemir (SOLVE): insights into the timing of insulin initiation in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. Diabetes Obes Metab 2012; 14: 654– 661. 22443213
- [23]Khunti K, Vora J, Davies M. Results from the UK cohort of SOLVE: providing insights into the timing of insulin initiation in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. Prim Care Diabetes 2014; 8: 57– 63. 24378771
- [24]Pantalone KM, Misra‐Hebert AD, Hobbs TM, et al. Clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes management: evidence from a large. real‐world data set. Diabetes Care 2018; 41: e 113–e 114. 29678811
- [25]Reach G, Pechtner V, Gentilella R, et al. Clinical inertia and its impact on treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab 2017; 43: 501– 511. 28754263
- [26]Yokoyama H, Oishi M, Takamura H, et al. Large‐scale survey of rates of achieving targets for blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipids and prevalence of complications in type 2 diabetes (JDDM 40). BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2016; 4: e000294. PMC5051339 27752329
- [27]Huang ES, Laiteerapong N, Liu JY, et al. Rates of complications and mortality in older patients with diabetes mellitus: the diabetes and aging study. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 251– 258. 24322595 PMC3950338
- [28]Grant R, Adams AS, Trinacty CM, et al. Relationship between patient medication adherence and subsequent clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes glycemic management. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 807– 812. 17259469
- [29]Strain WD, Cos X, Hirst M, et al. Time to do more: addressing clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 105: 302– 312. 24956964
- [30]Tanaka N, Kurose T, Seino Y. Therapeutic inertia or individualization? Delay in clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin 2016; 32: 1477– 1478. 27181181
- Authors
- Maegawa, H., Ishigaki, Y., Langer, J., Saotome‐Nakamura, A., Andersen, M., & the Japan Diabetes Clinical Data Management (JDDM) Study Group
- Affiliations
- Shiga University of Medical Science (JP)
- Iwate Medical University (JP)
- Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
- StatGroup ApS Copenhagen Denmark
- Corresponding author
- Maegawa, Hiroshi
- Venue
- Journal of Diabetes Investigation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 374-381
- ISSN
- 2040-1116 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-1124
- PMC
- PMC7926254
- OpenAlex
- W3041883832
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Diabetes Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- clinical inertia, type 2 diabetes, oral antidiabetic drugs, glycemic control, HbA1c, treatment intensification, GLP-1 receptor agonists, insulin initiation, real-world data, Japanese patients
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Participation, Retrospective Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review