Cited by 51Nail Diseases and TreatmentsDermatological diseases and infestationsFungal Infections and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tinea capitis and tinea faciei in the Zurich area – an 8‐year survey of trends in the epidemiology and treatment patterns

Kieliger, S., Glatz, M., Cozzio, A., Bosshard, P.P.·2015·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Background: Tinea capitis and tinea faciei are dermatophyte infections of the scalp and glabrous skin of the face affecting mainly prepubertal children. During the past 30 years, a significant increase and a change in the pattern of infectious agents has been noted for tinea capitis. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine trends in the current epidemiological situation of tinea capitis and tinea faciei in the Zurich area, Switzerland and adjacent Central and Eastern Switzerland. Methods: Consecutive cases diagnosed between 2006 and 2013 were studied retrospectively. Results: A total of 90 tinea capitis and 40 tinea faciei cases were observed. Anthropophilic isolates (primarily Trichophyton violaceum and Microsporum audouinii) accounted for 76% of tinea capitis cases. In contrast, zoophilic isolates (primarily T. interdigitale) were responsible for 73% of tinea faciei cases. The peak incidence in both conditions was in 4–8 year‐old children. While the annual number of tinea faciei cases remained stable over the past 8 years, a trend for an increase in T. violaceum‐positive tinea capitis has been observed. This was mainly due to patients of African ethnicity. Conclusions: Anthropophilic isolates accounted for three quarters of tinea capitis and one quarter of tinea faciei cases. T. violaceum‐positive tinea capitis was primarily linked to patients of African ethnicity. Tinea capitis caused by Microsporum spp. was more refractory to therapy and needed longer treatment than Trichophyton spp.‐induced infection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdv.12908

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0190-9622(00)90001-X · DOI
  3. 10.1080/mmy.38.s1.183.188 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01819.x · DOI
  5. 10.1046/j.1525-1470.2002.00047.x · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01748.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02339.x · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2005.01138.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.lpm.2008.10.017 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2011.01535.x · DOI
  11. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05022.x · DOI
  12. 10.1159/000063913 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283293d9b · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01424.x · DOI
  15. 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2001.00214.x · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1994.tb02892.x · DOI
  17. Drakensjo IT, 2011, Epidemiology of dermatophyte infections in Stockholm, Sweden: a retrospective study from 2005–2009, Med Mycol, 49, 484
  18. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01249.x · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s11046-013-9637-0 · DOI
  20. 10.3109/13693786.2010.522602 · DOI
  21. 10.3109/13693786.2012.746476 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11046-008-9099-y · DOI
  23. R Core Team, 2013, R: A Language and Environment For Statistical Computing
  24. Haedersdal M, 2003, An outbreak of tinea capitis in a child care centre, Dan Med Bull, 50, 83
  25. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02181.x · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s11046-007-9081-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/14651858.CD004685 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31814efe06 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2011.01595.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 51

Metadata

Authors
Kieliger, S., Glatz, M., Cozzio, A., & Bosshard, P. P.
Affiliations
University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Bosshard, P.P.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-10
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1524-1529
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W2094187351
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
tinea capitis, tinea faciei, dermatophytosis, Trichophyton violaceum, Trichophyton interdigitale, Microsporum audouinii, anthropophilic dermatophytes, zoophilic dermatophytes, epidemiological trends, treatment patterns, African ethnicity, children, Zürich
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Microsporum, Retrospective Studies, Switzerland, Time Factors, Tinea Capitis, Trichophyton, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review