The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals
Open accessAbstract
The evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity relies on the presence of cues that enable organisms to adjust their phenotype to match local conditions. Although mostly studied with respect to nonsocial cues, it is also possible that parents transmit information about the environment to their offspring. Such ‘anticipatory parental effects’ or ‘adaptive transgenerational plasticity’ can have important consequences for the dynamics and adaptive potential of populations in heterogeneous environments. Yet, it remains unknown how widespread this form of plasticity is. Using a meta‐analysis of experimental studies with a fully factorial design, we show that there is only weak evidence for higher offspring performance when parental and offspring environments are matched compared with when they are mismatched. Estimates of heterogeneity among studies suggest that effects, when they occur, are subtle. Study features, environmental context, life stage and trait categories all failed to explain significant amounts of variation in effect sizes. We discuss theoretical and methodological reasons for the limited evidence for anticipatory parental effects and suggest ways to improve our understanding of the prevalence of this form of plasticity in nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental plasticity and human health
Bateson, P., Barker, D., Clutton-Brock, T., Deb, D., D'Udine, B., Foley, R. A., Gluckman, P., Godfrey, K., Kirkwood, T., Lahr, M. M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02725 · Cited by 1,742
Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis
Nakagawa, S., & Santos, E. S. A. (2012) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-012-9555-5 · Cited by 1,032
Self-citationTransgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants
Agrawal, A. A., Laforsch, C., & Tollrian, R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43425 · Cited by 862
Cited by
Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals
Snyder-Mackler, N., Burger, J. R., Gaydosh, L., Belsky, D. W., Noppert, G. A., Campos, F. A., Bartolomucci, A., Yang, Y. C., Aiello, A. E., O’Rand, A., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax9553 · Cited by 679
The biology of developmental plasticity and the predictive adaptive response hypothesis
Bateson, P., Gluckman, P., & Hanson, M. (2014) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.271460 · Cited by 533
Nonindependence and sensitivity analyses in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses
Noble, D. W. A., Lagisz, M., O'dea, R. E., & Nakagawa, S. (2017) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14031 · Cited by 267
Self-citationEvidence of experimental bias in the life sciences: why we need blind data recording
Holman, L., Head, M. L., Lanfear, R., & Jennions, M. D. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002190 · Cited by 263
Beehner, J. C., & Bergman, T. J. (2017) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.03.003 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Uller, T., Nakagawa, S., & English, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-13
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2161-2170
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2160080616
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jeb.12212
- The paper
- Uller, T., Nakagawa, S., & English, S. (2013). Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.