The probability of parallel genetic evolution from standing genetic variation
Abstract
Parallel evolution is often assumed to result from repeated adaptation to novel, yet ecologically similar, environments. Here, we develop and analyse a mathematical model that predicts the probability of parallel genetic evolution from standing genetic variation as a function of the strength of phenotypic selection and constraints imposed by genetic architecture. Our results show that the probability of parallel genetic evolution increases with the strength of natural selection and effective population size and is particularly likely to occur for genes with large phenotypic effects. Building on these results, we develop a Bayesian framework for estimating the strength of parallel phenotypic selection from genetic data. Using extensive individual‐based simulations, we show that our estimator is robust across a wide range of genetic and evolutionary scenarios and provides a useful tool for rigorously testing the hypothesis that parallel genetic evolution is the result of adaptive evolution. An important result that emerges from our analyses is that existing studies of parallel genetic evolution frequently rely on data that is insufficient for distinguishing between adaptive evolution and neutral evolution driven by random genetic drift. Overcoming this challenge will require sampling more populations and the inclusion of larger numbers of loci.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reliance on standing variation is expected to increase the repeatability of evolution.
“Last, reliance on standing variation is expected to increase the repeatability of evolution (MacPherson and Nuismer, 2017; Thompson et al., 2019).”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as MacPherson and Nuismer, 2017
Cites
Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe
Tishkoff, S. A., Reed, F. A., Ranciaro, A., Voight, B. F., Babbitt, C. C., Silverman, J. S., Powell, K., Mortensen, H. M., Hirbo, J. B., Osman, M., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1946 · Cited by 1,615 · see citing works
Genetic analysis of cavefish reveals molecular convergence in the evolution of albinism
Protas, M. E., Hersey, C., Kochanek, D., Zhou, Y., Wilkens, H., Jeffery, W. R., Zon, L. I., Borowsky, R., & Tabin, C. J. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1700 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Gross, J. B., Borowsky, R., & Tabin, C. J. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000326 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Anderson, J. B., Sirjusingh, C., Parsons, A. B., Boone, C., Wickens, C., Cowen, L. E., & Kohn, L. M. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/163.4.1287 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“Last, reliance on standing variation is expected to increase the repeatability of evolution (MacPherson and Nuismer, 2017; Thompson et al., 2019).”
The dynamics of adaptation to stress from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations
Ament-Velásquez, S. L., Gilchrist, C., Rêgo, A., Bendixsen, D. P., Brice, C., Grosse-Sommer, J. M., Rafati, N., & Stelkens, R. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac242 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacPherson, A., & Nuismer, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Idaho (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacPherson, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 326-337
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2547332371
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DEB 1118947, DEB 1450653)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- parallel evolution, standing genetic variation, phenotypic selection, genetic architecture, effective population size, adaptive evolution, genetic drift, mathematical models of evolution, agent-based modeling
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Probability, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Evolution, Molecular, Genetic Drift
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review