The effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of clinical nurse specialists in outpatient roles: a systematic review
Abstract
Rationale, aims and objectives: Increasing numbers of clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) are working in outpatient settings. The objective of this paper is to describe a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the cost‐effectiveness of CNSs delivering outpatient care in alternative or complementary provider roles. Methods: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and seven other electronic databases, 1980 to J uly 2012 and hand‐searched bibliographies and key journals. RCTs that evaluated formally trained CNSs and health system outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed using the C ochrane risk of bias tool and the Q uality of H ealth E conomic S tudies instrument. We used the G rading of R ecommendations A ssessment, D evelopment and E valuation to assess quality of evidence for individual outcomes. Results: Eleven RCTs, four evaluating alternative provider (n = 683 participants) and seven evaluating complementary provider roles (n = 1464 participants), were identified. Results of the alternative provider RCTs (low‐to‐moderate quality evidence) were fairly consistent across study populations with similar patient outcomes to usual care, some evidence of reduced resource use and costs, and two economic analyses (one fair and one high quality) favouring CNS care. Results of the complementary provider RCTs (low‐to‐moderate quality evidence) were also fairly consistent across study populations with similar or improved patient outcomes and mostly similar health system outcomes when compared with usual care; however, the economic analyses were weak. Conclusions: Low‐to‐moderate quality evidence supports the effectiveness and two fair‐to‐high quality economic analyses support the cost‐effectiveness of outpatient alternative provider CNSs. Low‐to‐moderate quality evidence supports the effectiveness of outpatient complementary provider CNSs; however, robust economic evaluations are needed to address cost‐effectiveness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nineteen studies were ex-post economic evaluations; of those, 17 were cost-effectiveness analyses.
“Nineteen studies were ex-post economic evaluations of which 17 were CEAs with one CUA [7, 12, 14, 15, 17] [18–30, 33].”
From Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields—a systematic literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., & deBeer, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · Cited by 10,681 · see citing works
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Rind, D., Devereaux, P. J., Montori, V. M., Freyschuss, B., Vist, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012 · Cited by 2,693 · see citing works
A framework for the introduction and evaluation of advanced practice nursing roles
Bryant‐Lukosius, D., & DiCenso, A. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03235.x · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Self-citationExamining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES
Ofman, J. J., Sullivan, S. D., Neumann, P. J., Chiou, C.-F., Henning, J. M., Wade, S. W., & Hay, J. W. (2003) · Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.1.53 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
The Impact of Nonphysician Clinicians
Laurant, M., Harmsen, M., Wollersheim, H., Grol, R., Faber, M., & Sibbald, B. (2009) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558709346277 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roberts, S. L. E., Healey, A., & Sevdalis, N. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0901-7 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kilpatrick, K., Kaasalainen, S., Donald, F., Reid, K., Carter, N., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Martin‐Misener, R., Harbman, P., Marshall, D. A., Charbonneau‐Smith, R., & DiCenso, A.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- KJ Research Rosemere Quebec Canada
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Canadian Centre for Advanced Practice Nursing Research Hamilton Ontario Canada
- Corresponding author
- Kilpatrick, Kelley
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1106-1123
- ISSN
- 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2753
- OpenAlex
- W2097028250
- Semantic Scholar
- ddecfdab47db4b659c2ecc7b255943d0112a0b72
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement
- Health Canada
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (06514)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- clinical nurse specialists, outpatient care, cost-effectiveness, health system outcomes, resource utilization (health care), patient outcomes, economic evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Ambulatory Care, Canada, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Nurse Clinicians, Outpatients, Quality of Health Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Health Care Costs, Evidence-Based Medicine, Nurse's Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review