Cited by 31Diabetes Management and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Education and Validation

A nurse‐led interdisciplinary approach to promote self‐management of type 2 diabetes: a process evaluation of post‐intervention experiences

Whitehead, Lisa C., Crowe, Marie T., Carter, Janet D., Maskill, Virginia R., Carlyle, Dave, Bugge, Carol, Frampton, Chris M. A.·2017·Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives: Self‐management of type 2 diabetes through diet, exercise and for many medications, are vital in achieving and maintaining glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. A number of interventions have been designed to improve self‐management, but the outcomes of these are rarely explored from a qualitative angle and even fewer through a process evaluation. Method: A process evaluation was conducted using a qualitative design with participants randomized to an intervention. Seventy‐three people living with type 2 diabetes and hyperglycaemia for a minimum of 1 year, randomized to one of two interventions (n = 34 to an education intervention and n = 39 to an education and acceptance and commitment therapy intervention) completed stage one of the process evaluation, immediately following the intervention through written feedback guided by open‐ended questions. A purposive sample of 27 participants completed semi‐structured interviews at 3 and 6 months post intervention. Interview data were transcribed and data analysed using a thematic analysis. Results: The majority of participants described an increase in knowledge around diabetes self‐management and an increased sense of personal responsibility. Participants also described changes in self‐management activities and reflected on the challenges in instigating and maintaining change to improve diabetes management. Conclusion: The complexities of implementing change in daily life to improve glycaemic control indicate the need for ongoing support post intervention, which may increase and maintain the effectiveness of the intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jep.12594

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitehead, L. C., Crowe, M. T., Carter, J. D., Maskill, V. R., Carlyle, D., Bugge, C., & Frampton, C. M. A.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • University of Canterbury (NZ)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Whitehead, Lisa C.
Venue
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-15
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
264-271
ISSN
  • 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2753
OpenAlex
W2510884106
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Strategy to Advance Research in Nursing and Allied Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, nurse-led intervention, multidisciplinary care, acceptance and commitment therapy, diabetes education, process evaluation, glycemic control, behavior change, patient knowledge, personal responsibility
MeSH terms
Aged, Behavior Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Interprofessional Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Patient Care Team, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review