Cited by 56Marine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

New and rare coastal fishes in the Azores islands: occasional events or tropicalization process?

Afonso, P., Porteiro, F. M., Fontes, J., Tempera, F., Morato, T., Cardigos, F., Santos, R. S.·2013·Journal of Fish Biology

Abstract

Seven coastal fish species are newly reported for the remote north Atlantic archipelago of the Azores: Mediterranean sand eel Gymnammodytes cicerelus, bar jack Caranx ruber, two-banded seabream Diplodus vulgaris, bastard grunt Pomadasys incisus, unicorn leatherjacket filefish Aluterus scriptus and longspined porcupinefish Diodon holacanthus. The occurrence is also confirmed for 19 species that had been hitherto cited occasionally for the region, totalling a list of two elasmobranchs and 23 teleosts. Diplodus vulgaris, which appears to have recently colonized the islands, as well as roughtail stingray Dasyatis centroura and golden grey mullet Liza aurata, re-cited based on new records, are frequent or common coastal species in the Azores. The remaining 22 species, exceptional or rare in the region, are of tropical or subtropical affinity and find their northernmost distribution limit within the central and north-east Atlantic Ocean precisely in the Azores. This biogeographical pattern contrasts with that of the Azorean coastal fish community and suggests a tropicalization process in the region in line with previous findings of similar patterns across the north-east Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. These novel data from the most isolated archipelago of the North Atlantic Ocean, located in a biogeographic boundary area where colonization opportunities are reduced, reinforce the need for long-term monitoring programmes of coastal fish communities and, in particular, of i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfb.12162

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afonso, P., Porteiro, F. M., Fontes, J., Tempera, F., Morato, T., Cardigos, F., & Santos, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade dos Açores (PT)
  • Direção Regional dos Assuntos do Mar (PT)
Corresponding author
Afonso, P.
Venue
Journal of Fish Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-10
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
272-294
ISSN
  • 0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8649
OpenAlex
W1910182610
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Fish Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CLIPE (PRAXIS/3/3.2/EMG/1957/95)
  • MAREFISH (FCT-POCTI/BSE/41207/2001)
  • MARÉ (Life-Nature B4-3200/98/509)
  • MAROV (PDCTM/P/MAR/15249/1999)
  • OGAMP (INTRREG IIIb-MAC/4.2/A2 2001)
  • MARMAC (INTERREG IIIb-03/MAC/4.2/A2 2004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
Azores, coastal fishes, new distribution record, tropicalization, species distribution limits, Diplodus vulgaris, Liza aurata, elasmobranchs, teleosts, Northeast Atlantic, fish monitoring
MeSH terms
Animals, Azores, Fishes, Phylogeny, Population Dynamics, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Phylogeography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review