CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39Meat and Animal Product QualitySpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesSmart Agriculture and AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A nondestructive intelligent approach to real‐time evaluation of chicken meat freshness based on computer vision technique

Taheri‐Garavand, Amin, Fatahi, Soodabeh, Shahbazi, Feizollah, de la Guardia, Miguel·2019·Journal of Food Process Engineering
DOI 10.1111/jfpe.13039
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this study, the capability of a procedure based on combination of computer vision (CV) and artificial intelligence techniques examined for intelligent and nondestructive prediction of chicken meat freshness during the spoilage process at 4°C. The proposed system comprises the following stages: capture images, image preprocessing, image processing, computing channels, feature extraction, feature selection by a hybrid of genetic algorithm (GA) and artificial neuronal network (ANN), and prediction by using ANN. The number of neurons in input layer was determined 33 (selected features) and freshness used as the output. The ideal ANN model was obtained with 33‐10‐1 topology. The high performance of the model was provided with a correlation coefficient of 0.98734 and MSE of 0.002045. The encouraging results of the current study obviously indicated the high potential of CV‐based system combined with an intelligence method as a smart, nondestructive, and reliable technique for online evaluation of chicken meat freshness. Practical application: Diagnosis and estimation of chicken meat freshness are considered a significant concern in meat quality for consumers. Computer Vision as a novel nondestructive technique can be utilized to evaluate the quality of products. We present the potential of computer vision‐based method as a smart, nondestructive, and reliable method for online prediction of the freshness of chicken meat.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfpe.13039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.009 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11947-009-0298-4 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.aca.2006.09.046 · DOI
  4. Altun A. A. &Allahverdi N.(2007). Neural network based recognition by using genetic algorithm for feature selection of enhanced finger prints. InInternational Conference on Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms(pp. 467–476) Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.024 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.098 · DOI
  7. Chaudhary P., 2012, Color transform based approach for disease spot detection on plant leaf, International Journal of Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3, 65
  8. 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.06.054 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.trac.2012.07.011 · DOI
  10. El Barbri N., 2014, A nondestructive method based on an artificial vision for beef meat quality assesement, International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engeineering, 2, 2060
  11. 10.1080/10408398.2010.507908 · DOI
  12. FAO, 2018, Meat market review
  13. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.01.005 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/10942912.2015.1118386 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.08.010 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s11694-016-9421-1 · DOI
  17. Gonzalez R. C., 2004, Digital image processing using MATLAB
  18. Gorbunova E. V., 2015, Photonic Instrumentation Engineering II 93690Z‐(1–7)
  19. Hagan M. T., 1996, Neural network design
  20. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.01.006 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.084 · DOI
  22. Kim J. Han D. Tai Y. W. &Kim J.(2014).Salient region detection via high‐dimensional color transform. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition(pp. 883‐890) Columbus OH. · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.020 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.03.006 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.052 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s12161-016-0475-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.052 · DOI
  28. Montgomery D. C., 2009, Introduction to statistical quality control
  29. Peng Y., 2015, Optical methods and techniques for meat quality inspection, Transactions of the ASABE, 58, 1371
  30. 10.1039/c2an35211g · DOI
  31. 10.1002/jsfa.4572 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.038 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.006 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.11.005 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.compag.2015.06.012 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb15961.x · DOI
  37. Xiao K., 2014, An improved method of detecting pork freshness based on computer vision in on‐line system, Sensors & Transducers, 169, 42
  38. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.116 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.02.004 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.07.015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Taheri‐Garavand, A., Fatahi, S., Shahbazi, F., & de la Guardia, M.
Affiliations
  • Lorestan University (IR)
  • Department of Analytical Chemistry University of Valencia Burjassot Spain
Corresponding author
Taheri‐Garavand, Amin
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-05
Volume
42
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0145-8876 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4530
DOI
10.1111/jfpe.13039
OpenAlex
W2921338884
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Journal of Food Process Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
meat spoilage, computer vision, artificial neural networks, genetic algorithm feature selection, feature extraction, image processing, cold storage, meat quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A nondestructive intelligent approach to real‐time evaluation of chicken meat freshness based on computer vision technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jfpe.13039
The paper
Taheri‐Garavand, A., Fatahi, S., Shahbazi, F., & de la Guardia, M. (2019). A nondestructive intelligent approach to real‐time evaluation of chicken meat freshness based on computer vision technique. Journal of Food Process Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13039