Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frailty and Fracture, Disability, and Falls: A Multiple Country Study From the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women

Open access
Tom, Sarah E., Adachi, Jonathan D., Anderson, Frederick A., Boonen, Steven, Chapurlat, Roland D., Compston, Juliet E., Cooper, Cyrus, Gehlbach, Stephen H., Greenspan, Susan L., Hooven, Frederick H., Nieves, Jeri W., Pfeilschifter, Johannes, Roux, Christian, Silverman, Stuart, Wyman, Allison, LaCroix, Andrea Z.·2013·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To test whether women aged 55 and older with increasing evidence of a frailty phenotype would have greater risk of fractures, disability, and recurrent falls than women who were not frail, across geographic areas ( A ustralia, E urope, and N orth A merica) and age groups. Design: Multinational, longitudinal, observational cohort study. Setting: Global L ongitudinal S tudy of O steoporosis in W omen ( GLOW ). Participants: Women (N = 48,636) aged 55 and older enrolled at sites in Australia, Europe, and North America. Measurements: Components of frailty (slowness and weakness, poor endurance and exhaustion, physical activity, and unintentional weight loss) at baseline and report of fracture, disability, and recurrent falls at 1 year of follow‐up were investigated. Women also reported health and demographic characteristics at baseline. Results: Women younger than 75 from the U nited S tates were more likely to be prefrail and frail than those from A ustralia, C anada, and E urope. The distribution of frailty was similar according to region for women aged 75 and older. Odds ratios from multivariable models for frailty versus nonfrailty were 1.23 (95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 1.07–1.42) for fracture, 2.29 (95% CI = 2.09–2.51) for disability, and 1.68 (95% CI = 1.54–1.83) for recurrent falls. The associations for prefrailty versus nonfrailty were weaker but still indicated statistically significantly greater risk of each outcome. Overall, associations between frailty and each outcome were similar across age and geographic region. Conclusion: Greater evidence of a frailty phenotype is associated with greater risk of fracture, disability, and falls in women aged 55 and older in 10 countries, with similar patterns across age and geographic region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.12146

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Tom, S. E., Adachi, J. D., Anderson, F. A., Boonen, S., Chapurlat, R. D., Compston, J. E., Cooper, C., Gehlbach, S. H., Greenspan, S. L., Hooven, F. H., Nieves, J. W., Pfeilschifter, J., Roux, C., Silverman, S., Wyman, A., & LaCroix, A. Z.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
327-334
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2035804436
Cited by
160
References
3
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frailty and Fracture, Disability, and Falls: A Multiple Country Study From the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jgs.12146
The paper
Tom, S. E., Adachi, J. D., Anderson, F. A., Boonen, S., Chapurlat, R. D., Compston, J. E., Cooper, C., Gehlbach, S. H., Greenspan, S. L., Hooven, F. H., Nieves, J. W., Pfeilschifter, J., Roux, C., Silverman, S., Wyman, A., & LaCroix, A. Z. (2013). Frailty and Fracture, Disability, and Falls: A Multiple Country Study From the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.