Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Tai Chi on Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Open access
Wayne, Peter M., Walsh, Jacquelyn N., Taylor‐Piliae, Ruth E., Wells, Rebecca E., Papp, Kathryn V., Donovan, Nancy J., Yeh, Gloria Y.·2014·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize and critically evaluate research on the effects of T ai C hi on cognitive function in older adults. Design: Systematic review with meta‐analysis. Setting: Community and residential care. Participants: Individuals aged 60 and older (with the exception of one study) with and without cognitive impairment. Measurements: Cognitive ability using a variety of neuropsychological testing. Results: Twenty eligible studies with a total of 2,553 participants were identified that met inclusion criteria for the systematic review; 11 of the 20 eligible studies were randomized controlled trials ( RCT s), one was a prospective nonrandomized controlled study, four were prospective noncontrolled observational studies, and four were cross‐sectional studies. Overall quality of RCT s was modest, with three of 11 trials categorized as high risk of bias. Meta‐analyses of outcomes related to executive function in RCT s of cognitively healthy adults indicated a large effect size when T ai C hi participants were compared with nonintervention controls ( H edges' g = 0.90; P = .04) and a moderate effect size when compared with exercise controls ( H edges' g = 0.51; P = .003). Meta‐analyses of outcomes related to global cognitive function in RCT s of cognitively impaired adults, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to dementia, showed smaller but statistically significant effects when T ai C hi was compared with nonintervention controls ( H edges' g = 0.35; P = .004) and other active interventions ( H edges' g = 0.30; P = .002). Findings from nonrandomized studies add further evidence that T ai C hi may positively affect these and other domains of cognitive function. Conclusion: T ai C hi shows potential to enhance cognitive function in older adults, particularly in the realm of executive functioning and in individuals without significant impairment. Larger and methodologically sound trials with longer follow‐up periods are needed before more‐definitive conclusions can be drawn.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.12611

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Wayne, P. M., Walsh, J. N., Taylor‐Piliae, R. E., Wells, R. E., Papp, K. V., Donovan, N. J., & Yeh, G. Y.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2008617776
Cited by
425
References
54
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Tai Chi on Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jgs.12611
The paper
Wayne, P. M., Walsh, J. N., Taylor‐Piliae, R. E., Wells, R. E., Papp, K. V., Donovan, N. J., & Yeh, G. Y. (2014). Effect of Tai Chi on Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12611

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.