Cited by 35Ethics in Clinical ResearchCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Participant and Caregiver Perspectives on Clinical Research During Covid-19 Pandemic.

Open access
Padala, Prasad R., Jendro, Ashlyn M., Gauss, C. Heath, Orr, L. Casey, Dean, Kim T., Wilson, Kerrie B., Parkes, Christopher M., Padala, Kalpana P.·2020·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has massively disrupted essential clinical research. Many regulatory organizations have rightfully advocated to temporarily halt enrollment and curtail all face-to-face interactions. Views and opinions of patients and their caregivers are seldom considered while making such decisions. The objective was to study older participants' and their caregivers' perspectives to participate in ongoing clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: VISN-16/Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs. PARTICIPANTS: Older participants and their caregivers (N = 51) enrolled in ongoing clinical research studies. MEASUREMENTS: Questions about perceptions of safety to attend research visit, the level of panic among the general public, and medical center's preparedness in handling the pandemic. Other questions identified the source of pandemic information and the preference of a phone or in-person visit. RESULTS: Mean age was 69.3 (±9.4) years, 53% were male, 39% were caregivers, and 65% were Caucasian. Majority (78%) of the participants felt safe/very safe attending the scheduled research appointment; 63% felt that the extra screening made them feel safe/very safe; 82% felt that the medical center was prepared/very prepared for the pandemic. Participants split evenly on their preference for phone versus in-person visits. Family members and television news media were the commonly used sources of pandemic information irrespective of their education. Perceptions were influenced by gender and source of information, not by age or education. Females perceived higher level of panic compared to males (P = .02). Those relying on news media felt safer compared to those that relied on family members (P = .008). CONCLUSION: Even though informants felt that the medical center was prepared to handle the pandemic, only half the participants preferred the in-person visit. Pandemic information was obtained from family members or the television news media. Knowing patients' perspectives may help researchers be better prepared for future pandemics. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:E14-E18, 2020.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.16500

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 35

Authors
Padala, P. R., Jendro, A. M., Gauss, C. H., Orr, L. C., Dean, K. T., Wilson, K. B., Parkes, C. M., & Padala, K. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas Medical Center (US)
  • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Padala, Prasad R.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-04
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
E14-E18
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W3017056495
Cited by
35
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX002638, I01 RX002961)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, clinical research participation, older adults, caregivers, patient perspectives, news media, family members, hospital preparedness, gender differences
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pneumonia, Viral, Caregivers, Coronavirus Infections, Research Subjects, Biomedical Research, Pandemics, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review