Participant and Caregiver Perspectives on Clinical Research During Covid-19 Pandemic.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has massively disrupted essential clinical research. Many regulatory organizations have rightfully advocated to temporarily halt enrollment and curtail all face-to-face interactions. Views and opinions of patients and their caregivers are seldom considered while making such decisions. The objective was to study older participants' and their caregivers' perspectives to participate in ongoing clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: VISN-16/Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs. PARTICIPANTS: Older participants and their caregivers (N = 51) enrolled in ongoing clinical research studies. MEASUREMENTS: Questions about perceptions of safety to attend research visit, the level of panic among the general public, and medical center's preparedness in handling the pandemic. Other questions identified the source of pandemic information and the preference of a phone or in-person visit. RESULTS: Mean age was 69.3 (±9.4) years, 53% were male, 39% were caregivers, and 65% were Caucasian. Majority (78%) of the participants felt safe/very safe attending the scheduled research appointment; 63% felt that the extra screening made them feel safe/very safe; 82% felt that the medical center was prepared/very prepared for the pandemic. Participants split evenly on their preference for phone versus in-person visits. Family members and television news media were the commonly used sources of pandemic information irrespective of their education. Perceptions were influenced by gender and source of information, not by age or education. Females perceived higher level of panic compared to males (P = .02). Those relying on news media felt safer compared to those that relied on family members (P = .008). CONCLUSION: Even though informants felt that the medical center was prepared to handle the pandemic, only half the participants preferred the in-person visit. Pandemic information was obtained from family members or the television news media. Knowing patients' perspectives may help researchers be better prepared for future pandemics. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:E14-E18, 2020.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study of older adults and caregivers during the Covid-19 pandemic found the vast majority (78%) felt safe or very safe attending a scheduled research appointment and that the medical centre was prepared/very prepared (82%).
“Reassuringly, a study of older adults and caregivers during the Covid-19 pandemic found the vast majority (78%) felt safe or very safe attending a scheduled research appointment and that the medical centre was prepared/very prepared (82%) [22].”
To date, the perspective on the risk-benefit of trial participation during pandemics from trial participants directly has been missed.
“To date, this perspective on the risk-benefit of trial participation during pandemics from trial participants directly has been missed [22].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Padala, P. R., Jendro, A. M., Gauss, C. H., Orr, L. C., Dean, K. T., Wilson, K. B., Parkes, C. M., & Padala, K. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas Medical Center (US)
- Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Padala, Prasad R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-05-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E14-E18
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- PMC
- PMC7264630
- OpenAlex
- W3017056495
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX002638, I01 RX002961)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, clinical research participation, older adults, caregivers, patient perspectives, news media, family members, hospital preparedness, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pneumonia, Viral, Caregivers, Coronavirus Infections, Research Subjects, Biomedical Research, Pandemics, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review