Cited by 299Sustainable Industrial EcologySustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Common Misconceptions about Recycling

Geyer, Roland, Kuczenski, Brandon, Zink, Trevor, Henderson, Ashley·2016·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: The recycling of material resources lies at the heart of the industrial ecology (IE) metaphor. The very notion of the industrial ecosystem is motivated by the idea that we should learn from natural ecosystems how to “close the loop.” Recycling is not just central to IE, it is part of everyday life. Unfortunately, how the IE community and the public at large think about recycling includes several misconceptions that have the potential to misguide environmental assessments, policies, and actions that deal with recycling and thus undermine its environmental potential. One misconception stems from naïve assumptions regarding recycled material displacing primary production. Two others assert the environmental advantages of recycling material multiple times, or at least in a closed loop. A final misconception is the assumption that the distinction between closed and open recycling loops is generally useful. This article explains why these misconceptions are flawed, discusses the implications, and presents an alternative set of principles to better harness the potential environmental benefits of closing material loops.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.12355

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geyer, R., Kuczenski, B., Zink, T., & Henderson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Loyola Marymount University (US)
Corresponding author
Geyer, Roland
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2015-10-28
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1010-1017
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W1949824051
Cited by
299
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 5
FWCI
28.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (#1335478)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
recycling, misconceptions, industrial ecology, industrial ecosystems, closed-loop recycling, material displacement, primary production, environmental benefits of recycling, recycling policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review