Common Misconceptions about Recycling
Abstract
Summary: The recycling of material resources lies at the heart of the industrial ecology (IE) metaphor. The very notion of the industrial ecosystem is motivated by the idea that we should learn from natural ecosystems how to “close the loop.” Recycling is not just central to IE, it is part of everyday life. Unfortunately, how the IE community and the public at large think about recycling includes several misconceptions that have the potential to misguide environmental assessments, policies, and actions that deal with recycling and thus undermine its environmental potential. One misconception stems from naïve assumptions regarding recycled material displacing primary production. Two others assert the environmental advantages of recycling material multiple times, or at least in a closed loop. A final misconception is the assumption that the distinction between closed and open recycling loops is generally useful. This article explains why these misconceptions are flawed, discusses the implications, and presents an alternative set of principles to better harness the potential environmental benefits of closing material loops.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater benefits come about where components' performance is enhanced, such that a secondary resource can perform a duty normally performed by a material of greater environmental impacts.
“Greater benefits come about where components' performance is enhanced, such that a secondary resource can perform a duty normally performed by a material of greater environmental impacts [125].”
From Cross-Laminated Secondary Timber: Experimental Testing and Modelling the Effect of Defects and Reduced Feedstock Properties (2018) · cites this paper as [125]
Cites
Extended Self in a Digital World: Table 1.
Belk, R. W. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/671052 · Cited by 1,698 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700782 · Cited by 18,606 · see citing works
Self-citationA review and typology of circular economy business model patterns
Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12763 · Cited by 1,256 · see citing works
Zink, T., & Geyer, R. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12545 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Self-citationEriksen, M. K., Pivnenko, K., Faraca, G., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T. F. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c03435 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Rose, C. M., Bergsagel, D., Dufresne, T., Unubreme, E., Lyu, T., Duffour, P., & Stegemann, J. A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114118 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Greater benefits come about where components’ performance is enhanced, such that a secondary resource can perform a duty normally performed by a material of greater environmental impacts [125].”
BackgroundBrooks, L., & Gaustad, G. (2021) · Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy · doi:10.1007/s40831-021-00361-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Geyer, R., Kuczenski, B., Zink, T., & Henderson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Loyola Marymount University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Geyer, Roland
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2015-10-28
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1010-1017
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W1949824051
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 28.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (#1335478)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- recycling, misconceptions, industrial ecology, industrial ecosystems, closed-loop recycling, material displacement, primary production, environmental benefits of recycling, recycling policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review