The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New mineral activity–composition relations for thermodynamic calculations in metapelitic systems
Abstract
New activity–composition (a–x) relations for minerals commonly occurring in metapelites are presented for use with the internally consistent thermodynamic dataset of Holland & Powell (, Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 29, 333–383). The a–x relations include a broader consideration of Fe 2 O 3 in minerals, changes to the formalism of several phases and order–disorder in all ferromagnesian minerals where Fe–Mg mixing occurs on multiple sites. The a–x relations for chlorite, biotite, garnet, chloritoid, staurolite, cordierite, orthopyroxene, muscovite, paragonite and margarite have been substantially reparameterized using the approach outlined in the companion paper in this issue. For the first time, the entire set of a–x relations for the common ferromagnesian minerals in metapelitic rocks is parameterized simultaneously, with attention paid to ensuring that they can be used together to calculate phase diagrams of geologically appropriate topology. The a–x relations developed are for use in the Na 2 O–CaO–K 2 O–FeO–MgO–Al 2 O 3–SiO 2–H 2 O–TiO 2–O 2 (NCKFMASHTO) system for both subsolidus and suprasolidus conditions. Petrogenetic grids in KFMASH and KFMASHTO are similar in topology to those produced with earlier end‐member datasets and a–x relations, but with some notable differences. In particular, in subsolidus equilibria, the FeO/(FeO + MgO) of garnet is now greater than in coexisting staurolite, bringing a number of key staurolite‐bearing equilibria into better agreement with inferences from field and petrographic observations. Furthermore, the addition of Fe 3+ and Ti to a number of silicate phases allows more plausible equilibria to be calculated in relevant systems. Pseudosections calculated with the new a–x relations are also topologically similar to equivalent diagrams using earlier a–x relations, although with many low variance fields shifting in P–T space to somewhat lower pressure conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kelsey, D. E., & Hand, M. (2015) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.09.006 · Cited by 441
Palin, R. M., Weller, O. M., Waters, D. J., & Dyck, B. (2016) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2015.08.005 · Cited by 352
Melting of Peridotites through to Granites: A Simple Thermodynamic Model in the System KNCFMASHTOCr
Holland, T. J. B., Green, E. C. R., & Powell, R. (2018) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/egy048 · Cited by 312
Self-citationThe contribution of metamorphic petrology to understanding lithosphere evolution and geodynamics
Brown, M. (2014) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.02.005 · Cited by 279
Earth’s oldest stable crust in the Pilbara Craton formed by cyclic gravitational overturns
Wiemer, D., Schrank, C. E., Murphy, D. T., Wenham, L., & Allen, C. M. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0105-9 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- White, R. W., Powell, R., Holland, T. J. B., Johnson, T. E., & Green, E. C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Metamorphic Geology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-286
- ISSN
- 0263-4929 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1314
- OpenAlex
- W1997842666
- Cited by
- 1,321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New mineral activity–composition relations for thermodynamic calculations in metapelitic systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jmg.12071
- The paper
- White, R. W., Powell, R., Holland, T. J. B., Johnson, T. E., & Green, E. C. R. (2014). New mineral activity–composition relations for thermodynamic calculations in metapelitic systems. Journal of Metamorphic Geology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmg.12071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.