Cited by 64Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIon Channels and ReceptorsMigraine and Headache Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cutaneous innervation of the human face as assessed by skin biopsy

Open access

Abstract

The morphology of cutaneous sensory and autonomic innervation in human trigeminal territory is still unknown. The aim of this study is to describe facial cutaneous innervation using skin biopsy. This new tool could be useful in understanding the mechanisms underlying several facial pain conditions. In 30 healthy subjects, we quantified epidermal nerve fibers (ENFs) and dermal myelinated fibers (MFs) in V1, V2 and V3, using indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy applied to 2-mm punch skin biopsies from areas adjacent to the eyebrow, upper and lower lip. Using selective markers, we also evaluated the distribution of peptidergic, cholinergic and noradrenergic fibers. Facial skin appeared abundantly innervated and rich in annexes. The ENF density decreased and the MF density increased, moving from the supraorbital to the perioral skin. Noradrenergic sudomotor fibers were particularly and constantly expressed compared with other body sites. Distribution of vasoactive intestinal peptide-immunoreactive (VIP-ir) fibers appeared peculiar for their constant presence in the subepidermal neural plexus - in close contact, but without colocalization with calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (Sub-P)-ir fibers. Finally, in perioral skin samples, we observed striated muscle fibers with their motor nerves and motor endplates. Our work provides the first morphological study of human facial cutaneous innervation, highlighting some unique features of this territory.…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joa.12001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The density of myelinated fibers was estimated as 8.0, 15.9, and 16.4 per mm2 in V1, V2, and V3, respectively.

    “The pattern of the sensory innervation changes across the three divisions and the density of myelinated fibers was estimated by Nolano et al. (2013) as 8.0, 15.9, and 16.4 per mm 2 in V1, V2, and V3, respectively.”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Nolano et al. 2013

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1212/WNL.16.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/mus.880170303 · DOI
  3. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00298.2010 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/brain/awg227 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02969.x · DOI
  6. 10.1002/ana.20769 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00415-012-6432-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/brain/110.3.793 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00021-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90301-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90535-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1113/eph8702477 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.026 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0306-3623(94)00155-G · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00040-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0022-510X(93)90223-L · DOI
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06825.1994 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01260.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03023.x · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00271.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01006.x · DOI
  22. 10.1002/ana.10615 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1986.tb07991.x · DOI
  24. 10.1002/mus.20771 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/cne.10998 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.041 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/mus.21506 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.04.006 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.018 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00151-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nolano, M., Provitera, V., Caporaso, G., Stancanelli, A., Leandri, M., Biasiotta, A., Cruccu, G., Santoro, L., & Truini, A.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IT)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Nolano, Maria
Venue
Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-18
Volume
222
Issue
2
Pages
161-169
ISSN
  • 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7580
OpenAlex
W2065118616
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
Keywords
trigeminal nerve, epidermal nerve fibers, facial pain, skin biopsy, vasoactive intestinal peptide, calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, noradrenergic fibers, motor endplate, facial skin
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Peripheral Nerves, Skin, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review