Cited by 38Tactile and Sensory InteractionsComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Comparative analysis of Meissner's corpuscles in the fingertips of primates

Open access
Verendeev, Andrey, Thomas, Christian, McFarlin, Shannon C., Hopkins, William D., Phillips, Kimberley A., Sherwood, Chet C.·2015·Journal of Anatomy

Abstract

Meissner's corpuscles (MC s) are tactile mechanoreceptors found in the glabrous skin of primates, including fingertips. These receptors are characterized by sensitivity to light touch, and therefore might be associated with the evolution of manipulative abilities of the hands in primates. We examined MC s in different primate species, including common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus,n = 5), baboon (Papio anubis,n = 2), rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta,n = 3), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes,n = 3), bonobo (Pan paniscus,n = 1) and human (Homo sapiens,n = 8). Fingertips of the first, second and fourth digits were collected from both hands of specimens, dissected and histologically stained using hematoxylin and eosin. The density (MC s per 1 mm 2) and the size (cross‐sectional diameter of MC s) were quantified. Overall, there were no differences in the densities of MC s or their size among the digits or between the hands for any species examined. However,MC s varied across species. We found a trend for higher densities of MC s in macaques and humans compared with chimpanzees and bonobos; moreover, apes had larger MC s than monkeys. We further examined whether the density or size of MC s varied as a function of body mass, measures of dexterity and dietary frugivory. Among these variables, only body size accounted for a significant amount of variation in the size of MC s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joa.12327

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the human fingertip, 3-5,000 Meissner corpuscles/cm2 can be found.

    “In the human fingertip, 3-5,000 MCs/cm 2 can be found (Nolano et al. 2003;Verendeev et al. 2015).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Verendeev et al. 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verendeev, A., Thomas, C., McFarlin, S. C., Hopkins, W. D., Phillips, K. A., & Sherwood, C. C.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Trinity University (US)
Corresponding author
Verendeev, Andrey
Venue
Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-05
Volume
227
Issue
1
Pages
72-80
ISSN
  • 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7580
OpenAlex
W1936655859
Cited by
38
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS042867 and NS073134)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (220020293)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Meissner corpuscles, fingertip, primate skin, glabrous skin, receptor density, receptor size, body mass, dexterity, frugivory, hand evolution, Callithrix jacchus, Papio anubis, rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, bonobos, human
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fingers, Humans, Mechanoreceptors, Primates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review