Cited by 41Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anxiety and fear in patients with short waiting times before coronary artery bypass surgery – a qualitative study

Abstract

Aims and objectives To obtain qualitative information on fears and anxieties of coronary artery bypass grafting patients with short waiting periods (up to a maximum of four weeks) before surgery. Background Coronary artery bypass grafting is a standard procedure in cardiac surgery. However, many patients suffer significant anxiety and fear before the operation. Preoperative anxiety and fear correlate with adverse outcomes, but there is a lack of data on the emotional stressors for patients with short waiting periods as applicable in Germany. This knowledge would be a prerequisite for the development of in-hospital interventions to reduce patients' anxieties and fears. Design An exploratory study was chosen to learn about patients' anxieties and fears. Method The day before coronary artery bypass grafting, 24 patients were examined with respect to their emotional experience using semi-structured interviews. The results were categorised by inductive content analysis. Results The overall waiting time for coronary artery bypass grafting was 6 ± 6 days. According to the analysis, the patients' statements were grouped in 'fears', 'negation of fears' and 'other emotional and physical conditions'. The interviews could cover all categories simultaneously. Eighteen patients mentioned fears, and most of them referred to specific issues. However, 16 of the 18 patients also named nonspecific fears and uncertainties. Fifteen patients negated fear. Twenty-three patients described their emot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.12467

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feuchtinger, J., Burbaum, C., Heilmann, C., Imbery, C., Siepe, M., Stotz, U., Fritzsche, K., & Beyersdorf, F.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Feuchtinger, Johanna
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-27
Volume
23
Issue
13-14
Pages
1900-1907
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2154095604
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
preoperative anxiety, preoperative fear, coronary artery bypass grafting, patient emotions, uncertainty, frustration, somatic symptoms, cardiac surgery patients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Anxiety, Coronary Artery Bypass, Fear, Female, Germany, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Waiting Lists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review