Cited by 404Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHealth Sciences Research and EducationPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Decision‐making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review

Open access
Nibbelink, Christine W., Brewer, Barbara B.·2018·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To identify and summarise factors and processes related to registered nurses’ patient care decision‐making in medical–surgical environments. A secondary goal of this literature review was to determine whether medical–surgical decision‐making literature included factors that appeared to be similar to concepts and factors in naturalistic decision making (NDM). Background: Decision‐making in acute care nursing requires an evaluation of many complex factors. While decision‐making research in acute care nursing is prevalent, errors in decision‐making continue to lead to poor patient outcomes. Naturalistic decision making may provide a framework for further exploring decision‐making in acute care nursing practice. A better understanding of the literature is needed to guide future research to more effectively support acute care nurse decision‐making. Design: PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched, and research meeting criteria was included. Data were identified from all included articles, and themes were developed based on these data. Results: Key findings in this review include nursing experience and associated factors; organisation and unit culture influences on decision‐making; education; understanding patient status; situation awareness; and autonomy. Conclusions: Acute care nurses employ a variety of decision‐making factors and processes and informally identify experienced nurses to be important resources for decision‐making. Incorporation of evidence into acute care nursing practice continues to be a struggle for acute care nurses. This review indicates that naturalistic decision making may be applicable to decision‐making nursing research. Relevance to clinical practice: Experienced nurses bring a broad range of previous patient encounters to their practice influencing their intuitive, unconscious processes which facilitates decision‐making. Using naturalistic decision making as a conceptual framework to guide research may help with understanding how to better support less experienced nurses’ decision‐making for enhanced patient outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.14151

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Benner P Tanner C 1987 Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition American Journal of Nursing 87 1 23 31 3642979
  2. Benner P Tanner C Chesla C 1992 From beginner to expert: gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing Advances in Nursing Science 14 3 13 28 1550330
  3. Braaten JS 2015 Hospital System Barriers to Rapid Response Team Activation: A Cognitive Work Analysis American Journal of Nursing 115 2 22 33 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000460673.82070.af 25588088 · DOI
  4. Bucknall T 2000 Critical care nurses’ decision-making activities in the natural clinical setting Journal of Clinical Nursing 9 1 25 35 11022489
  5. Bucknall T 2003 The clinical landscape of critical care: nurses’ decision-making Journal of Advanced Nursing 43 3 310 319 12859790
  6. Cappelletti A Engel JK Prentice D 2014 Systematic Review of Clinical Judgment and Reasoning in Nursing Journal of Nursing Education 53 8 453 458 10.3928/01484834-20140724-01 25050560 · DOI
  7. Carvalho PVR dos Santos IL Vidal MCR 2005 Nuclear power plant shift supervisor’s decision making during microincidents International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 7 619 644 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.01.010 · DOI
  8. Cioffi J 2012 Expanding the scope of decision-making research for nursing and midwifery practice International Journal of Nursing Studies 49 4 481 489 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.015 22078210 · DOI
  9. Corcoran-Perry SA Bungert B 1992 Enhancing orthopaedic nurses’ clinical decision making Orthopedic Nursing 11 3 64 70 1625917
  10. Corcoran SA 1986 Task complexity and nursing expertise as factors in decision making... processes used by nurses to plan patient care Nursing Research 35 2 107 112 3633505
  11. Davids EL Roman NV 2014 A systematic review of the relationship between parenting styles and children’s physical activity African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance, Supplement 2 1 228 246
  12. Doherty-King B Bowers BJ 2013 Attributing the responsibility for ambulating patients: A qualitative study International Journal of Nursing Studies 50 9 1240 1246 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.02.007 23465958 PMC3711943 · DOI
  13. Dougherty L Sque M Crouch R 2012 Decision-making processes used by nurses during intravenous drug preparation and administration Journal of Advanced Nursing 68 6 1302 1311 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05838.x 21999334 · DOI
  14. Hamm RM 1988 Clinical Intuition and Clinical Analysis: Expertise and Cognitive Continuum Dowie JEA Professional Judgment: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making 78 105 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  15. Hammond KR 1996 How convergence of research paradigms can improve research on diagnostic judgment Medical Decision Making 16 3 281 287 8818127
  16. Hammond KR Kelly KJ Schneider RJ Vancini M 1967 Clinical inference in nursing: revising judgments Nursing Research 16 1 38 45 5180790
  17. Johansen ML O’Brien JL 2015 Decision Making in Nursing Practice: A Concept Analysis Nursing Forum 10.1111/nuf.12119 25639525 · DOI
  18. Klein G Calderwood R Clinton-Cirocco A 2010 Rapid Decision Making on the Fire Ground: The Original Study Plus a Postscript Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 4 3 186 209 10.1518/155534310X12844000801203 · DOI
  19. Kohn LT Corrigan JM Donaldson MS 1999 Errors in health care: A leading cause of death and injury. To err is human: Building a safer health system 26 48 Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/download.php?record_id=9728# 25077248
  20. Lake S Moss C Duke J 2009 Nursing prioritization of the patient need for care: a tacit knowledge embedded in the clinical decision-making literature International Journal of Nursing Practice 15 5 376 388
  21. Lauri S Salantera S 1998 Decision-making models in different fields of nursing Research in Nursing and Health 21 5 443 452 9761141
  22. Lipshitz R Klein G Orasanu J Salas E 2001 Taking stock of naturalistic decision making Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 14 5 331 352 10.1002/bdm.381 · DOI
  23. Melin-Johansson C Palmqvist R Ronnberg L 2017 Clinical intuition in the nursing process and decision-making-A mixed-studies review Journal of Clinical Nursing 10.1111/jocn.13814 28329439 · DOI
  24. Pantazopoulos I Tsoni A Kouskouni E Papadimitriou L Johnson EO Xanthos T 2012 Factors influencing nurses’ decisions to activate medical emergency teams Journal of Clinical Nursing 21 17/18 2668 2678 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04080.x 22889450 · DOI
  25. Parker CG 2014 Decision-making models used by medical-surgical nurses to activate rapid response teams Medsurg Nursing 23 3 159 164 25137791
  26. Paul S Hice A 2014 Role of the Acute Care Nurse in Managing Patients With Heart Failure Using Evidence-Based Care Critical Care Nursing Quarterly 37 4 357 376 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000036 25185764 · DOI
  27. Pretz JE Folse VN 2011 Nursing experience and preference for intuition in decision making Journal of Clinical Nursing 20 19–20 2878 2889 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03705.x 21592247 · DOI
  28. Price A Zulkosky K White K Pretz J 2017 Accuracy of intuition in clinical decision-making among novice clinicians Journal of Advanced Nursing 73 5 1147 1157 10.1111/jan.13202 27862180 · DOI
  29. Radwin LE 1998 Empirically generated attributes of experience in nursing Journal of Advanced Nursing 27 3 590 595 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00548.x 9543046 · DOI
  30. Randel JM Pugh HL Reed SK 1996 Differences in expert and novice situations awareness in naturalistic decision making International Journal of Human-Computers Studies 45 5 579 597
  31. Rew L Barrow EM Jr 2007 State of the science: intuition in nursing, a generation of studying the phenomenon Advances in Nursing Science 30 1 E15 25 17299273
  32. Rycroft-Malone J Fontenla M Seers K Bick D 2009 Protocol-based care: the standardisation of decision-making? Journal of Clinical Nursing 18 10 1490 1500 19413539
  33. Samuriwo R Dowding D 2014 Nurses’ pressure ulcer related judgements and decisions in clinical practice: A systematic review International Journal of Nursing Studies 51 12 1667 1685 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.009 24835078 · DOI
  34. Seright TJ 2011 Clinical decision-making of rural novice nurses Rural Remote Health 11 3 1726 21787110
  35. Simmons B Lanuza D Fonteyn M Hicks F Holm K 2003 Clinical reasoning in experienced nurses...including commentary by Heims ML with author response Western Journal of Nursing Research 25 6 701 724 14528618
  36. Simon HA 1959 Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science The American Economic Review 49 3 253 283
  37. Stubbings L Chaboyer W McMurray A 2012 Nurses’ use of situation awareness in decision-making: an integrative review Journal of Advanced Nursing 68 7 1443 1453 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05989.x 22429250 · DOI
  38. Tanner CA 2006 Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing Journal of Nursing Education 45 6 204 211 16780008
  39. Thompson C Stapley S 2011 Do educational interventions improve nurses’ clinical decision making and judgement? A systematic review International Journal of Nursing Studies 48 7 881 893 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.12.005 21241984 · DOI
  40. Tower M Chaboyer W Green Q Dyer K Wallis M 2012 Registered nurses’ decision-making regarding documentation in patients’ progress notes Journal of Clinical Nursing 21 19–20 2917 2929 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04135.x 22784185 · DOI
  41. Tummers GER van Merode GG Landeweerd JA 2002 The diversity of work: differences, similarities and relationships concerning characteristics of the organisation, the work and psychological work reactions in intensive care and non-intensive care nursing International Journal of Nursing Studies 39 8 841 855 12379302
  42. Vifladt A Simonsen BO Lydersen S Farup PG 2016 The association between patient safety culture and burnout and sense of coherence: A cross-sectional study in restructured and not restructured intensive care units Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 36 26 34 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2016.03.004 27212614 · DOI
  43. Whittemore R Chao A Jang M Minges KE Park C 2014 Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview Heart and Lung 43 5 453 461 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014 25012634 · DOI
  44. Whittemore R Knafl K 2005 The integrative review: updated methodology Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 5 546 553 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x 16268861 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nibbelink, C. W., & Brewer, B. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Nibbelink, Christine W.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-23
Volume
27
Issue
5-6
Pages
917-928
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2766700952
Cited by
404
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM011271)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
nursing decision-making, naturalistic decision making, acute care nursing, medical-surgical nursing, situational awareness, nurses' experiences, nursing autonomy, unit culture, evidence-based practice, clinical intuition, patient outcomes
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Awareness, Clinical Competence, Decision Making, Humans, Nurses, Nursing Research, Critical Care Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review