Cited by 58Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The risk factors of antenatal depression: A cross‐sectional survey

Chen, Jiarui, Cross, Wendy M., Plummer, Virginia, Lam, Louisa, Sun, Mei, Qin, Chunxiang, Tang, Siyuan·2019·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the prevalence of depression in the third trimester of pregnancy and identify the related demographic risk factors. Background Antenatal depression as a disabling and treatable disease has a wide-ranging impact on perinatal women and has received extensive attention from researchers. Design A cross-sectional survey was conducted at three public hospitals. Methods Demographic questionnaire was developed from the literature review, and depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. A binary logistic regression model was used to assess the association between depression and demographic predictors. STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was applied in this paper (see Appendix S1). Result A total of 773 pregnant women participated in the study. 29.6% of participants scored more than 9 points on Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. In the final logistic model, living in rural area, marital satisfaction, assisted reproductive technology, lacking of prenatal health knowledge and life events were strongly significantly associated with antenatal depression. Moreover, living in an extended family, without Medicare insurance, unemployed, working as civil servants or healthcare workers, and lower household income also predicted antenatal depression. However, education level, smoking or drinking before pregnancy was found not to be associated with antenatal depression. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the prevalence of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.14955

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Cross, W. M., Plummer, V., Lam, L., Sun, M., Qin, C., & Tang, S.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Federation University (AU)
  • Peninsula Health (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Sun, Mei
  • Tang, Siyuan
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-28
Volume
28
Issue
19-20
Pages
3599-3609
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2948241111
Cited by
58
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
antenatal depression, third trimester, risk factors, marital satisfaction, assisted reproduction, life events, rural residence, household income, Medicare insurance, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, prevalence, perinatal mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review