Cited by 12Aortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Neuroanatomy and severity of stroke in patients with type A aortic dissection

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strokes are a longstanding complication of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. Understanding the neuroanatomy, mechanism, and severity of stroke will facilitate efforts to improve prediction, prevention, and treatment strategies. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who sustained stroke from a consecutive series of patients undergoing ATAAD repair. Neuroimaging was interpreted by two stroke neurologists blinded to clinical results. Severity of stroke was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Residual disability at 30 days was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: Twenty percent (38/189) of patients undergoing repair for ATAAD had stroke (unilateral 58%, bi-hemispheric 42% [p = .33]). All strokes were ischemic. No significant lateralization (right vs. left) was noted with unilateral strokes (26% vs. 32%, p = .67). Etiology of stroke was embolic (58%), hypoperfusion (26%), mixed (11%), and unknown (5%). There were no intraoperative variables that correlated with the neuroanatomy or mechanism of stroke. Preoperative carotid dissection was seen in 40% (n = 15), while postoperatively 10% (n = 4) sustained intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO). Strokes were moderate or severe (NIHSS ≥ 9) in 97% of cases, with 66% incidence of moderate residual disability (mRS ≥ 3) at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Strokes associated with ATAAD are severe at presentation resulting in significant disability. One in 10 strokes is due to LVO and potentially amenable to endovascular treatment. Heterogeneity in both location and etiology of stroke makes prevention challenging. Future trials may evaluate the role of early neuroimaging and simultaneous treatment of stroke given advancements in endovascular therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocs.16136

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.088 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.144 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/jocs.13511 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.071 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.086 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.025 · DOI
  7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031264 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.053 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.016 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/ejcts/ezx465 · DOI
  11. 10.1159/000135646 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/ncpcardio1417 · DOI
  13. 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chandra A, 2017, The cerebral circulation and cerebrovascular disease I: anatomy, Brain Circ, 3, 45, 10.4103/bc.bc_10_17 · DOI
  15. Ringelstein EB, 2012, Stroke Syndromes, 480, 10.1017/CBO9781139093286.042 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.012 · DOI
  17. 10.1161/01.STR.30.8.1538 · DOI
  18. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.039 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/ejcts/ezz071 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)34874-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1161/01.STR.25.12.2398 · DOI
  23. 10.1159/000090791 · DOI
  24. 10.1161/01.STR.0000155727.82242.e1 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X · DOI
  26. 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.106 · DOI
  28. 10.1056/NEJMoa1800410 · DOI
  29. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.492363 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Fichadiya, A., Menon, B. K., Gregory, A. J., Teleg, E., & Appoo, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Appoo, Jehangir J.
Venue
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
339-347
ISSN
  • 0886-0440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8191
OpenAlex
W3211433520
Cited by
12
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiac Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
type A aortic dissection, stroke, neuroanatomy, stroke severity, embolic stroke, intracranial large vessel occlusion, carotid artery dissection, stroke etiology, residual disability, endovascular treatment, stroke prevention
MeSH terms
Aortic Dissection, Brain Ischemia, Humans, Neuroanatomy, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Endovascular Procedures, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review