The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
META‐ANALYSIS OF ECONOMICS RESEARCH REPORTING GUIDELINES
Abstract
Meta‐regression analysis (MRA) can provide objective and comprehensive summaries of economics research. Their use has grown rapidly over the last few decades. To improve transparency and to raise the quality of MRA, the meta‐analysis of economics research‐network (MAER‐Net) has created the below reporting guidelines. Future meta‐analyses in economics will be expected to follow these guidelines or give valid reasons why a meta‐analysis must deviate from them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Cited by
A solution to minimum sample size for regressions
Jenkins, D. G., & Quintana-Ascencio, P. F. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229345 · Cited by 665
“Similar to mixed-effects regressions that represent fixed and random effects, recent meta-regression methods can include proxies for variation among individuals as random effects in mixed-effects models, where the example N = 15 (above) represents the fixed effects [5,6,7].”
MethodThe Power of Bias in Economics Research
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12461 · Cited by 634
Self-citationLatif, Z., mengke, Y., Danish, Latif, S., Ximei, L., Pathan, Z. H., Salam, S., & Jianqiu, Z. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.006 · Cited by 389
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE TAX AVOIDANCE: A REVIEW OF THE CHANNELS, MAGNITUDES, AND BLIND SPOTS
Beer, S., de Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2020) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12305 · Cited by 312
ARE WOMEN REALLY MORE RISK‐AVERSE THAN MEN? A RE‐ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE USING EXPANDED METHODS
Nelson, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12069 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., Giles, M., Heckemeyer, J. H., Johnston, R. J., Laroche, P., Nelson, J. P., Paldam, M., Poot, J., Pugh, G., Rosenberger, R. S., & Rost, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Surveys
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 390-394
- ISSN
- 0950-0804 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6419
- OpenAlex
- W1543073918
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: META‐ANALYSIS OF ECONOMICS RESEARCH REPORTING GUIDELINES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joes.12008
- The paper
- Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., Giles, M., Heckemeyer, J. H., Johnston, R. J., Laroche, P., Nelson, J. P., Paldam, M., Poot, J., Pugh, G., Rosenberger, R. S., & Rost, K. (2013). META‐ANALYSIS OF ECONOMICS RESEARCH REPORTING GUIDELINES. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
